Biden's Debate Prep Includes This Physical Test. I Don't Think It's Going Well.
CNN's Van Jones Explains Why the Obama Coalition Is Collapsing Right Now
Notice What's Embarrassing About The Associated Press' Fact-Check About Biden's LA Fundrai...
Do You Feel a Draft?
My Record Really Stood Out
America Needs to Supercharge Nuclear Energy
LA Opens Taxpayer-Funded Luxury Homeless Shelter
The IG Report on the FDA’s Response to Infant Formula Recall Is Here
'Thou Shalt Not Post the Ten Commandments!'
The Future of Democracy?
The Case for J.D. Vance
Trump Derangement Syndrome Is Raging Among the Left
Republican Leaders Shouldn’t Force Members to Vote on Politically Toxic Bills
RFK Jr. Deserves Secret Service Protection

Questions Mount Over Biden Plan to Allow Immigration Benefits for Terror Supporters

AP Photo

As Townhall reported last week, the Biden administration enacted a new "determination" allowing exceptions to established prohibitions on terrorism-connected individuals receiving immigration benefits in the United States in order to bring Taliban associates into the country from Afghanistan. 


Now, a group of Republican senators led by Bill Hagerty (R-TN) are demanding answers from the Biden administration given the disaster that was its withdrawal from Afghanistan one year ago and its failure to deal with illegal immigration along the U.S.-Mexico border. 

"We write because the American people deserve an explanation regarding the broad, open-ended nature of this authority for exempting individuals who would otherwise be barred from immigration to the United States for supporting a terrorist organization," the Republican members of the Senate explain in their letter to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. 

"The June 8 Determination alters U.S. immigration policy and for obvious reasons affects the security of the United States by making individuals who provided material support to terrorist organizations eligible to enter the United States and receive 'immigration benefits or other status[es]' at the expense of American taxpayers," the letter notes. "This sort of substantial, inadequately explained change to U.S. immigration policy implicating obvious U.S. national security interests merits further explanation and congressional scrutiny."

The letter acknowledges that the executive branch — namely the heads of DHS and the State Department — "can exempt certain persons from this prohibition" under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(3)(B)(i) but notes that "[u]sually, such an exemption is limited to specific groups or conflicts for obvious reasons."


There are a few times in recent history when individuals were exempted from the prohibition, as the Republican senators explain:

For example, in 2019, this authority was applied to visa or other immigration-related applications for an activity or association relating to the Lebanese Forces militias (“2019 Determination”). The 2019 Determination is narrowly tailored and does not apply outside the context of the Lebanese civil war that occurred between 1975 and 1990. It also clearly states that it does not apply to any alien that engaged in terrorist activity or knowingly provided any level of material support to terrorist activities that targeted noncombatants or U.S. interests. 

Similarly, in 2012, this exemption authority was applied with respect to aliens in the context of activities or associations relating to the uprisings against Saddam Hussein’s government in Iraq (“2012 Determination”). Like the 2019 Determination, the 2012 Determination is confined to a specific group of aliens from a certain geographic area during a specified period of time.

However, the Biden administration's new exemption from early June "widely exempts persons who provided 'insignificant material support' or 'limited material support under circumstances' to a designated terrorist organization."


Under Biden, the Department of Homeland Security has claimed its broad exemption is to help "vulnerable Afghans" but the latest official edict in the matter "makes no mention of Afghanistan or Afghan refugees and is not limited to the categories of Afghan individuals" that were described in press releases on the exemption. As the senators point out, the Biden administration's exemption "is not limited to certain conflicts, terrorist organizations, geographic regions, or time periods at all."

The Republicans' letter also points out that the Biden administration issued a similar exemption "that was specifically limited to individuals who were employed as civil servants in Afghanistan during a specific time frame" and therefore more in-line with previous exemptions to immigration prohibitions for associates of terrorists. But the more tailored exemption "highlights and calls into question the broad, open-ended nature of the June 8 Determination, which is not in any way limited to vulnerable Afghans or persons involved with the conflict in Afghanistan."

So what is the Biden administration up to? Why issue one exemption that's tailored and specific and another that's overly broad? Republican Senators point out that, under the Biden administration's wide exemption, "could include, for example, current or former members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and IRGC-linked entities, which are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. service members in Iraq and Afghanistan" and "could include individuals seeking asylum at the southern border."


The letter rightly asks why, if the Biden administration intends to protect Afghan refugees, the exemption was not issued in previous months rather than just before the one-year anniversary of Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Secretaries Mayorkas and Blinken have until September 12 to respond to the senators' inquiries that include:

  • a detailed description of the Afghan and non-Afghan nationals to whom the June 8 Determination has been or will be applied and examples of the insignificant material support or limited material support they provided to designated terrorist organizations
  • whether the June 8 Determination has been applied, or will be applied, to any individuals who have provided insignificant material support or limited material support to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps or any IRGC-linked entities
  • whether the June 8 Determination has been applied, or will be applied, to any individuals entering the United States at our border with Mexico 
  • an explanation for why the June 8 Determination is not limited to Afghan nationals or persons involved in the conflict in Afghanistan
  • an explanation for the timing of the Determination nearly one year after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan
  • a definition for the concept of "insignificant material support" and an explanation of how it's applied
  • a total number for how many individuals the June 8 Determination has been applied to and a projection of how many it will be be applied to

In addition to Hagerty, the letter is signed by Senators Rick Scott (R-FL), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), John Hoeven (R-ND), and Steve Daines (R-MT). 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos