Is This Really the Woman Who Can Help Harris With Her Blue Wall...
Kamala Is in Serious Trouble in Michigan
And Now The Atlantic Might Become Engulfed in a Journalistic Scandal for This...
I'm Shocked This MSNBC Host Didn't Self-Combust After Hearing What Philly Voters Had...
Kamala Again Got Asked This Question About Biden's Mental Health. She Did Another...
Unleash the Power of Persuasion
Play Time/Jail Time
Court Rules NY Can't Deny Second Amendment Rights to Poor People
'Release the Memes': Babylon Bee Scores Free Speech Win After Newsom Tried to...
Trump-Vance Campaign Files FEC Complaint Over Labour Staffers Coming to US to Campaign...
Is This a Sign the Left Is Having Buyer's Remorse Over Harris?
A Democrat Running in a Swing District Claimed to Support Border Security. Her...
Jennings Calls Out Cheney for One of Her Worst Comments While Campaigning With...
Fact Check: No, but Seriously, Did Kamala Harris Really Ever Work at a...
AOC Has a Meltdown About Trump Working at McDonald's
Tipsheet

BoJo Survives No-Confidence Vote

AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali, Pool

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson survived Monday's confidence vote called by 54 Tory PMs but, with a final tally of 211 for, 148 against — 58 percent supporting Johnson — emerges wounded from the attempt to remove him from party and government leadership. 

Advertisement

Johnson's victory was narrower than former Prime Minister Theresa May's 63 percent victory — though she stepped down some five months after — but still a win.

Contrary to many who said Monday's result was a larger defeat for Johnson or conservatives, Conservative MP James Cleverly called the result a "clear win" for Boris Johnson and noted that the percentage voting in support of the current PM is greater than he received in his initial leadership run. 

Still, his fellow Conservative MPs continued to say that — despite Johnson surviving the vote — he should "consider his position" in light of the challenges facing the U.K. and doubts of the Prime Minister's "honesty and integrity."

Advertisement

Parliamentary rules, as they stand, prevent another no-confidence vote for at least one year, a tense period in which those who voted against Johnson continuing in power will need to repair their relationships with the party and parliamentary leader or face being estranged from Johnson and allowing party infighting to distract from other agenda items. Still, the rules could in theory be changed to allow another attempt to remove Johnson, according to The (biased) BBC. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement