Nobody’s Calling London
CNN Produces a Romance Thriller for the NYC Bombers, and David French Backs...
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
Should the Supreme Court Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan?
Do Public Schools Need a 'Jan. 6 Insurrection' Course?
Fix What's Broken at Home so We Can Defend Ourselves Abroad
Blue-State Suicide
Protect the Border and the Ballot Box
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
The Left Is Really Mad That We Bought Our Troops Steak and Lobster...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
Tipsheet

Even Tony Blinken Knows Court Packing Is 'Anti-Democratic'

Even Tony Blinken Knows Court Packing Is 'Anti-Democratic'
Drew Angerer/Pool via AP

Democrats seeking to pack the Supreme Court with sympathetic justices aren't going to like what Secretary of State Tony Blinken said during his visit to Quito, Ecuador in the latest messaging blunder from the Biden administration.

Advertisement

Speaking about the "challenges facing democracies and how we can overcome them" on Wednesday, Blinken asked an audience to imagine a hypothetical "country where a leader is elected in a free and fair election, and then sets about chipping away slowly but surely at the pillars of democracy – attacking the free press, undermining the independence of the courts, threatening political opponents."

"Now, imagine that leader then seeks to use the levers of democracy to pass anti-democratic reforms," said Blinken before listing off a few examples of anti-democratic reforms: "eliminating term limits, packing courts, firing legislators."

Ah, so court packing is anti-Democratic?

"That’s the story of more than one democracy in our hemisphere. And it’s one of the ways that democracies can come undone," Blinken then warned.

Of course, Blinken is right. A court can't be independent or a separate branch of government with distinct powers if it is operating under the watchful eye of Congress knowing too many decisions perceived to run in one direction might result in action to supposedly "balance" the court.

So the question then is: Are we to believe Blinken's speechwriter and communications staff just forgot that his boss and a not-insignificant number of his boss' political allies are on the record saying they're open to adding more seats to the Supreme Court and filling it with ideological allies? Or did Blinken's team just think Americans wouldn't notice?

Advertisement

Well, if your name is Senator Ed Markey or Representative Jerry Nadler, now might be a good time to call your office. But it's not just the members of Congress who introduced a bill to expand the court who might not love what Blinken had to say about court packing.

According to The Washington Post, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Kirsten Gillibrand, Amy Klobuchar, and Elizabeth Warren all said during their 2020 campaigns that they were "open" to packing the Supreme Court — the thing the Secretary of State just called "anti-democratic." If Blinken is to be believed, it seems the Democratic Party is itself flirting with anti-democratic actions.

In a week where President Biden is struggling to figure out how much can be squeezed into his social spending budget reconciliation package with so-called progressives losing the most in terms of woke programs and total dollar amount, this isn't good for the Biden administration's standing among leftist Democrats. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement