Conspiracy Theorists Are Conspiring to Be Stupid
Of Course, Politico Says Christmas Is a Right Wing Boogaloo
NBC News Pushes Pity Piece for Judges Who Have Ruled Against Trump
Merry Christmas to All (and Thank God You’re Not a Democrat)
Slouching Toward Open Season on Jews
Kafka on Steroids
Jesus Brought Division, Not ‘Peace on Earth’
My Christmas Carol
In Appreciation of What Makes America's Generosity Possible
What 'A Christmas Carol' Taught Me About Purgatory
Why Christmas Is the Greatest Story of All Time
A Messianic Jew Reflects on Christmas
Let There Be Light
Joy to the World
Is President Donald Trump Going to Heaven?
Tipsheet

DOJ Joins Lawsuit Challenging California's Redistricting Maps

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The Department of Justice has sued California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Secretary of State Shirley Weber for the State of California’s newly adopted redistricting plan enacted with the passage of Proposition 50. 

Advertisement

The suit alleges that the plan mandates racially gerrymandered congressional districts in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

"California’s redistricting scheme is a brazen power grab that tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "Governor Newsom’s attempt to entrench one-party rule and silence millions of Californians will not stand."

Proposition 50 amends the California Constitution, allowing the legislature to draw a new congressional-district map. Substantial evidence, including that in the legislative record and public statements, indicates that the legislature created a new map in which Latino demographics and racial considerations predominated, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

"Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did with Prop 50," said Jesus A. Osete, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. "Californians were sold an illegal, racially gerrymandered map, but the U.S. Constitution prohibits its use in 2026 and beyond."

The 20-page document was filed in California's district court and claims that the proposition used race as a proxy to advance political interests. 

 Tangipa and US v Newsom 2 25 Cv 10616 Complaint in Intervention  by  scott.mcclallen 

"The race-based gerrymandered maps passed by the California legislature are unlawful and unconstitutional," said First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli of the Central District of California. "The U.S. Department of Justice is moving swiftly to prevent these illegal maps from tainting our upcoming elections. California is free to draw congressional maps, but they may not be drawn based on race."

The Department’s motion to intervene in Tangipa et al v Newsom is pending before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon has been recused from this case. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jesus A. Osete will represent the Department on this matter. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit asks the court to declare the redistricting map unlawful. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement