Trump May Have Delivered a Crushing Blow to the Iranian Regime
What Democrats Are Trying to Do to Pete Hegseth Shows How Unserious They...
Leftists Mobs Violently Attacked a TPUSA Journalist. Will They Face Justice?
The 'Universal Healthcare' Democrats Want Is a Death Sentence
Why Is the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding Public School Spending Data?
A 'British National' Murdered Two Women, Including a DHS Employee, in Georgia
Tom Homan Has the Perfect Response for Catholic Leaders Complaining About Immigration Enfo...
A U.K. Headteacher Warned People About the Southport Terrorist, Guess Why She Was...
Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Store Plan Gets Even Worse
Trump’s Not Wrong on the Euros
This Is What Passes for an Intelligent Gun Control Argument These Days
This Democrat Says He Is 'Disgusted' After Having Eric Swalwell on His Show
Inside NATO’s Contingency Plan for a US Exit From the Alliance, and Why...
Hasan Piker: 'The Fall of the USSR Was One of the Greatest Catastrophes...
A Top Democrat in California's Governor Race Just Vowed to Take the Most...
Tipsheet

DOJ Joins Lawsuit Challenging California's Redistricting Maps

DOJ Joins Lawsuit Challenging California's Redistricting Maps
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The Department of Justice has sued California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Secretary of State Shirley Weber for the State of California’s newly adopted redistricting plan enacted with the passage of Proposition 50. 

Advertisement

The suit alleges that the plan mandates racially gerrymandered congressional districts in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

"California’s redistricting scheme is a brazen power grab that tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "Governor Newsom’s attempt to entrench one-party rule and silence millions of Californians will not stand."

Proposition 50 amends the California Constitution, allowing the legislature to draw a new congressional-district map. Substantial evidence, including that in the legislative record and public statements, indicates that the legislature created a new map in which Latino demographics and racial considerations predominated, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

"Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did with Prop 50," said Jesus A. Osete, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. "Californians were sold an illegal, racially gerrymandered map, but the U.S. Constitution prohibits its use in 2026 and beyond."

The 20-page document was filed in California's district court and claims that the proposition used race as a proxy to advance political interests. 

 Tangipa and US v Newsom 2 25 Cv 10616 Complaint in Intervention  by  scott.mcclallen 

"The race-based gerrymandered maps passed by the California legislature are unlawful and unconstitutional," said First Assistant United States Attorney Bill Essayli of the Central District of California. "The U.S. Department of Justice is moving swiftly to prevent these illegal maps from tainting our upcoming elections. California is free to draw congressional maps, but they may not be drawn based on race."

The Department’s motion to intervene in Tangipa et al v Newsom is pending before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon has been recused from this case. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jesus A. Osete will represent the Department on this matter. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit asks the court to declare the redistricting map unlawful. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement