Property Taxes Might Be on the Way Out in This State
Trump Just Blew Up the Media's Narrative on Iran With a Single Post
Scott Pelley Claims of the 'Murder' of 60 Minutes Defied by Ratings; ABC...
No, Tim Walz, England and Australia Aren't 'Free' After Giving Up Guns
Spencer Pratt Has a Final Reminder For LA Voters Ahead of Tuesday's Primary
While Gavin Newsom Blames Trump For CA's Gas Prices, He Just Quietly Hiked...
Palmer Luckey Reveals Why China Is Outpacing the US in Manufacturing—and Why It’s...
Jerome Powell Is Out as Fed Chair, But He Is Still Taking Swipes...
Mamdani Is Running the Classic Socialist Playbook: Blaming Capitalism for Problems the Gov...
LOOK: Massive Cocaine Smuggling Tunnel Busted By Authorities
Police Officer Involved in Henry Nowak's Murder Resigns Amid Global Controversy
Anti-Weaponization Fund Is Dead, Blanche Says After Congressional Backlash
Sen. Dan Sullivan Threatens Lawsuit Against Mary Peltola's Fake Candidate Also Named 'Dan...
EXCLUSIVE: Incentive Proposed to Enable Homeland Security to Vet Voter Rolls
Starmer Lets Sikhs Keep the Knife That Killed Henry Nowak — but Won't...
Tipsheet

Arizona Federal Judge Rules Voters Must Prove Their U.S. Citizenship Status In Order to Vote In Elections

Arizona Federal Judge Rules Voters Must Prove Their U.S. Citizenship Status In Order to Vote In Elections

An Arizona federal judge is upholding a state law that requires voters to provide verification of their U.S. citizenship before their votes can be counted. 

Advertisement

Following a lawsuit that led to Arizona legislators facing accusations of discrimination for requiring voters to verify their U.S. citizenship, Judge Susan Bolton ruled on Thursday that such requirements were not discriminatory. 

In March 2022, a group of plaintiffs led by the Hispanic voting rights organization “Mi Familia Vota” filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, claiming that the state’s law was unconstitutional. 

The Biden Administration filed a separate complaint that was consolidated in the case. 

The plaintiffs argued that H.B. 2492 was a “baseless assault on Arizona’s election system based on a conspiracy theory that non-citizens are voting, despite a persistent lack of credible evidence to support such claim.” They added that it was “cynical” and of “bad faith” to use the “politically motivated and false allegations” to restrict people from voting in U.S. elections. 

However, Bolton argued that Arizona has an interest in preventing voter fraud as the 2024 presidential election nears. 

“Plaintiffs have not carried their burden to show that the Voting Laws’ remaining citizenship investigation procedures, [documentary proof of citizenship] requirements, and registration cancellation procedures violate the [National Voter Registration Act] or the [Voting Rights Act],” Bolton wrote in her ruling. “Nor do these provisions impose an undue burden on the right to vote or violate the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U.S. Constitution. Finally, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs failed to show that the Voting Laws were enacted with any discriminatory purpose.” 

“Considering the evidence as a whole, the court concludes that Arizona’s interests in preventing non-citizens from voting and promoting public confidence in Arizona’s elections outweigh the limited burden voters might encounter when required to provide (documentary proof of citizenship),” her ruling continued.

Advertisement

Related:

VOTER FRAUD

With millions of illegal migrants entering the U.S. through President Joe Biden’s open southern border and Arizona being considered a crucial battleground state in the presidential election, Bolton’s ruling is one step closer to putting a stop to the Left’s radical policies. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement