USA Today Once Again Eats Pavement Over This Tweet About Caitlin Clark
YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Trump Roasts the Media, RFK Jr., and Nikki Minaj at WHCA Dinner. Here's...
Bosnian War Crimes Suspect Indicted for Lying on U.S. Citizenship Application
Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
Tipsheet

A Wisconsin Referendum Is Possible As the State Decides on 14 Week Abortion Bill

A Wisconsin Referendum Is Possible As the State Decides on 14 Week Abortion Bill
AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

Late-term abortions are on the chopping block as Wisconsin Republicans introduce legislation to put limits on the anti-life procedure. 

This week, state Republicans called for a statewide referendum to decide on a 14-week abortion ban, asking voters to approve the policy through a ballot measure during April's election. The bill is being fast-tracked through the Legislature, with a public hearing scheduled for Monday. 

Advertisement

However, Gov. Tony Evers (D-WI) has already said he would veto the bill if passed— even before it's put on the ballot. 

On the contrary, Sen. Mary Felzkowski (R-Wisc.) said the measure is a reasonable approach to finding a consensus on the controversial issue that sways voters. 

"Out of an abundance of respect for how sensitive this issue is, we would like to hear directly from the voters whether they agree that this is what they want the law to be - striking a balance between protecting life and showing compassion and respect for women who find themselves in difficult situations," Felzkowski said. 

Currently, Wisconsin bans abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

"The bottom line for me is this: Wisconsinites should be able to make their own reproductive healthcare decisions without interference from politicians who don't know anything about their lives, their family, or their circumstances. And I'll veto any bill that makes reproductive healthcare any less accessible for Wisconsinites than it is right now," Evers said in a statement in December.

Last year, a Dane County Circuit judge ruled that a decades-old Wisconsin law does not prohibit abortions, cleaning the state bans feticide but not "consensual medical abortions." A Republican district attorney appealed the ruling from Dane County Circuit in December, in which state Rep. Amanda Nedweski predicted that the appeal would fail in the liberal state Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION

Abortion has become the central issue in political races in Wisconsin. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos— who co-sponsored the bill— said he wants voters to decide on abortion rules rather than the courts.

"I'd like to put something on the ballot in April that allows the people of Wisconsin to be the ones who get the final say on deciding on abortion. So it's not the court. It's not the Legislature. It's not the governor. It's going to be the people who get the final choice," he said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement