Have You Noticed How We're Discussing Fraud Now?
What Do You Notice About All These Stories About Somali Fraud in the...
AG Bondi Announces Indictments in Minnesota Somali Fraud Fiasco
Jasmine Crockett: Fake Progressive Hero of the Year
Peter Navarro's Book Is a Raw Retelling of His Experience in Prison
Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt
Trump’s Supply-Side Policies Spark High Growth and Low Inflation
2025 at the Fellowship: A Year of Impact
I Agree With Pope Leo About Gaza
Nonprofits Don’t Deserve Trust, They Earn It
In 2025, Climate Alarmism Bit the Dust As Socialism Rose From the Ashes
Uncle Sam Schools Us on New Year’s Resolutions
Netanyahu: Trump Will Receive Israel's Top Award
Leaked Photo Shows USPS Will Continue Using Migrant CDL Holders
Tennessee AG Cracks Down on Illegal Online Gambling
Tipsheet

Justice Alito Makes Grave Warning About the Decision To Pause Free Speech Ruling Against Biden Admin

Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Justice Samuel Alito is warning that a recent decision made by the Supreme Court majority might give the government the green light to censor Americans. 

On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a free speech case, Missouri v. Biden, that challenged the Biden Administration's communications with social media companies to censor the First Amendment. 

Advertisement

However, until the case can be heard, the Biden Administration's request to pause the lower court's order has been granted. 

Alito cautioned that the decision may be perceived as giving a "green light" to the government's use of "heavy-handed tactics" to censor free speech rights. 

Joining Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Court members condemned the decision in a dissent, calling it unreasonable. 

"At this time in the history of our country, what the Court has done, I fear, will be seen by some as giving the Government a green light to use heavy-handed tactics to skew the presentation of views on the medium that increasingly dominates the dissemination of news," Alito wrote. "That is most unfortunate." 

The justices added that it "allows the defendants to persist in committing the type of First Amendment violations that the lower courts identified."

More from the Daily Caller: 

In earlier filings with the Court, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued on behalf of the government that the lower court's injunction limited "the President's closest aides to use the bully pulpit to address matters of public concern." District of Louisiana Judge Terry A. Doughty issued the initial injunction in July. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals then narrowed the injunction to include only the White House, the surgeon general, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI to say that they violated the First Amendment in September, expanding it in October also to include the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Advertisement

The Biden Administration urged the Supreme Court to entirely block the injunction, claiming it would interfere with the White House, FBI, and health officials addressing public concerns and security. 

Alito slammed the administration's reason, saying the injunction "applies only when the Government crosses the line and begins to coerce or control others' exercise of their free-speech rights."

Republican Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey said he anticipates "dismantling" Biden's "vast censorship enterprise" when the Supreme Court hears the case.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement