USA Today Once Again Eats Pavement Over This Tweet About Caitlin Clark
YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Trump Roasts the Media, RFK Jr., and Nikki Minaj at WHCA Dinner. Here's...
Bosnian War Crimes Suspect Indicted for Lying on U.S. Citizenship Application
Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
Tipsheet

The Marine Corps Goes Woke

The Marine Corps Goes Woke
Jae C. Hong

In a world where everything that was once normal is now woke, it’s no surprise that the Marine Corps has also turned the tide. 

A newly released academic report from the University of Pittsburgh recommended that the U.S. Marine Corps drop the words “sir” and “ma’am” used to address senior officers to avoid “misgendering” drill instructors despite there only being 14,000 females in the Marine Corps, which makes up of only 7 percent of the branch.

Advertisement

Instead of using the words “sir” and “ma’am,” recruits in the military services refer to their drill instructors using their ranks or roles followed by their last names. 

The 738-page report highlights a $2 million study that was conducted to examine gender-integrated recruit training, which claimed that the change would make both genders feel more comfortable when being addressed by peers. 

However, not everyone is on board with the woke change. 

According to the Marine Corps Times, Col. Howard Hall, chief of staff for Marine Corps Training and Education Command, expressed several concerns. 

“That’s going to take some effort,” Hall said, adding “honestly, that’s not a quick fix. What is inculcating in our young recruits that will or will not be reinforced when they graduate and enter the fleet Marine force? So again, we want to avoid any quick-fix solutions that introduce perturbations down the line.”

Hall also argued that a sudden change in the service members will create unnecessary confusion and inconsistency. 

“All of a sudden, we change something at recruit training, and recruits start coming in and using a different identifier. It's not something we would change overnight," Hall said, adding “again, we've got a history of 'sir, ma'am, sir, ma'am.' If we change something at the root level, how do we make the corresponding change at the Fleet Marine Force? So it's not ours to implement alone."

Advertisement

Related:

MARINE CORPS

The report continued to argue that gender-neutral salutations are needed as well as highlighting how the Marine Corps training represents male recruits more often than females. 

“Gender-neutral identifiers are an unambiguous, impartial way to circumvent these issues,” the report read. “Employing gender-neutral identifiers eliminates the possibility of misgendering drill instructors, which can unintentionally offend or cause discord. By teaching recruits to use gender-neutral identifiers for their drill instructors, services underscore the importance of respecting authoritative figures regardless of gender.” 

The report pointed out how three out of five lessons on service history don’t mention female Marines despite only a very small percentage of military branches containing female service members. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement