The Cracks in the Democrat Coalition Were Exposed in Texas Primary
The Covenant Endures: Israel, Iran, and the Test of American Leadership
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 310: 'What Wonderous Love Is This'
The Current Middle Eastern Band-Aid
Anchors Away!
Stop Calling the United States a Secular State
James Talarico’s Time
Iranian Women’s Courage Must Not Be Forgotten on International Women’s Day, Part 2
The Money Doesn’t Lie: Trump Supports Families; Big Abortion Supports Itself
Husbands, Love Your Wives As Christ Loved the Church
The US-UK Relationship in Crisis: Iran Is Only the Latest Problem
Has the American Church Lost Its Way? The Church Pew’s Quiet Contribution to...
U.S. Embassy in Norway Targeted by Explosive in New Wave of Attacks on...
Virginia Fraud Ring Allegedly Used Jail Inmates’ Identities to Steal Pandemic Benefits
Illegal Immigrant Arrested for Allegedly Voting in 2024 Pennsylvania Federal Election
Tipsheet

The Marine Corps Goes Woke

The Marine Corps Goes Woke
Jae C. Hong

In a world where everything that was once normal is now woke, it’s no surprise that the Marine Corps has also turned the tide. 

A newly released academic report from the University of Pittsburgh recommended that the U.S. Marine Corps drop the words “sir” and “ma’am” used to address senior officers to avoid “misgendering” drill instructors despite there only being 14,000 females in the Marine Corps, which makes up of only 7 percent of the branch.

Advertisement

Instead of using the words “sir” and “ma’am,” recruits in the military services refer to their drill instructors using their ranks or roles followed by their last names. 

The 738-page report highlights a $2 million study that was conducted to examine gender-integrated recruit training, which claimed that the change would make both genders feel more comfortable when being addressed by peers. 

However, not everyone is on board with the woke change. 

According to the Marine Corps Times, Col. Howard Hall, chief of staff for Marine Corps Training and Education Command, expressed several concerns. 

“That’s going to take some effort,” Hall said, adding “honestly, that’s not a quick fix. What is inculcating in our young recruits that will or will not be reinforced when they graduate and enter the fleet Marine force? So again, we want to avoid any quick-fix solutions that introduce perturbations down the line.”

Hall also argued that a sudden change in the service members will create unnecessary confusion and inconsistency. 

“All of a sudden, we change something at recruit training, and recruits start coming in and using a different identifier. It's not something we would change overnight," Hall said, adding “again, we've got a history of 'sir, ma'am, sir, ma'am.' If we change something at the root level, how do we make the corresponding change at the Fleet Marine Force? So it's not ours to implement alone."

Advertisement

Related:

MARINE CORPS

The report continued to argue that gender-neutral salutations are needed as well as highlighting how the Marine Corps training represents male recruits more often than females. 

“Gender-neutral identifiers are an unambiguous, impartial way to circumvent these issues,” the report read. “Employing gender-neutral identifiers eliminates the possibility of misgendering drill instructors, which can unintentionally offend or cause discord. By teaching recruits to use gender-neutral identifiers for their drill instructors, services underscore the importance of respecting authoritative figures regardless of gender.” 

The report pointed out how three out of five lessons on service history don’t mention female Marines despite only a very small percentage of military branches containing female service members. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement