The Supreme Court Has Ruled on the Voting Rights Act
Here's What Cole Allen Did in the Weeks Leading Up to the WHCD...
With SCOTUS VRA Ruling, GA State Senator Dolezal Calls on Gov. Kemp to...
SCOTUS Just Ruled in Favor of a Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Targeted by New...
Remember When Jimmy Kimmel Didn't Like This Joke From Aaron Rodgers? We Do.
Sic Semper Tyrannis, According to the Media
Middle School Kids Honored for Act of Heroism on Their School Bus
While LA's Still Rebuilding, Karen Bass Announces Massive Renovation Project at Griffith P...
King Charles Gifted President Trump Something Incredibly Thoughtful
Switzerland's 'Assisted Suicide' Program Just Euthanized a Healthy Woman, and Here's the S...
This New York Bodega Owner Said He Feared for His Safety, and Now...
Brandon Johnson Admits Chicago Discriminates in Hiring City Employees
Checkmate: Trump’s Real Leverage
This Is Not Free Speech: Acting AG Todd Blanche Blasts Democrats for Defending...
The 'Warmth of Collectivism' Is Catching Up to Mamdani As He Begs NY...
Tipsheet

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon for Most Restrictive Gun Law in the Country

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon for Most Restrictive Gun Law in the Country
AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), Oregon State Shooting Association (OSSA), and Mazama Sporting Goods filed a lawsuit against the state’s recently passed Ballot Measure 114, which is considered one of the strictest gun control laws in the country. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims that the measure infringes upon the right of Oregon residents to buy and own firearms, imposing “severe and unprecedented burdens on individuals seeking to exercise perhaps the most basic right guaranteed by the Second Amendment.”

This is the third lawsuit filed since November 8, which was filed by the Oregon Firearms Federation (OFF), Sherman County Sheriff’s Department, Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC).

“The deficiencies in this ballot measure cannot go unaddressed. Forget that it is scheduled to go into effect before Oregon even certifies the election, but it requires potential gun owners to take a class that has yet to be created, at a cost yet to be determined, so that they can obtain a permit that doesn’t permit them to purchase a firearm,” NRA Oregon state director Aoibheann Cline said in a statement to the Daily Caller. 

The strict measure will require residents to get background checks, firearm training (which does not currently exist), fingerprint collection, and a permit to purchase any firearm. 

The lawsuit also alleges that the measure creates a “Kafkaesque regime” which they claim is not supported by history, tradition, or modern regulation.

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT

“Oregon’s Measure 114 is blatantly unconstitutional,” NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane said, adding “the right to keep and bear arms begins with the ability of law-abiding citizens to be able to obtain a firearm through a lawful purchase at a firearm retailer.”

He also said that it threatens the most constitutional right… “Oregon has created an impossible-to-navigate labyrinth that will achieve nothing except to deny Second Amendment rights to its citizens. The measure is an affront to civil liberties which belong to People, not to the state to grant on impossible and subjective criteria,” Keane added. 

The state has rushed to pass the measure, meaning no one will be able to buy a firearm beginning on December 8. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement