Notice Anything Regarding All These Angry, Miserable White Liberal Women?
Watch CNN's Top Legal Analyst Gut Minnesota Dems' Laughable Anti-ICE Lawsuit
Fox News' Greg Gutfeld Has a Thought Exercise That Wrecks the 'Fake Empathy...
There's More Intrigue About the Secret Sonic Weapon Reportedly Used During Trump's Caracas...
Do You Think Liberals Know They're Wrong About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis?
Is Trump Souring on Pam Bondi?
Trump Finally Fixed the Food Pyramid
Trump Administration Ends Temporary Protected Status for Thousands of Somalis
ICE, ICE Baby?
The Left Is So Desperate to Defend Their Minneapolis Narrative, They’ve Hit a...
A Chicago Man Was Brutally Attacked in the Loop. Guess How Many Times...
It Depends on Where You Stand
Something Doesn’t Add Up
Are You Being Baited Into Rage?
Dignity for Thee—Not for Me
Tipsheet

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon for Most Restrictive Gun Law in the Country

AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), Oregon State Shooting Association (OSSA), and Mazama Sporting Goods filed a lawsuit against the state’s recently passed Ballot Measure 114, which is considered one of the strictest gun control laws in the country. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims that the measure infringes upon the right of Oregon residents to buy and own firearms, imposing “severe and unprecedented burdens on individuals seeking to exercise perhaps the most basic right guaranteed by the Second Amendment.”

This is the third lawsuit filed since November 8, which was filed by the Oregon Firearms Federation (OFF), Sherman County Sheriff’s Department, Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC).

“The deficiencies in this ballot measure cannot go unaddressed. Forget that it is scheduled to go into effect before Oregon even certifies the election, but it requires potential gun owners to take a class that has yet to be created, at a cost yet to be determined, so that they can obtain a permit that doesn’t permit them to purchase a firearm,” NRA Oregon state director Aoibheann Cline said in a statement to the Daily Caller. 

The strict measure will require residents to get background checks, firearm training (which does not currently exist), fingerprint collection, and a permit to purchase any firearm. 

The lawsuit also alleges that the measure creates a “Kafkaesque regime” which they claim is not supported by history, tradition, or modern regulation.

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT

“Oregon’s Measure 114 is blatantly unconstitutional,” NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane said, adding “the right to keep and bear arms begins with the ability of law-abiding citizens to be able to obtain a firearm through a lawful purchase at a firearm retailer.”

He also said that it threatens the most constitutional right… “Oregon has created an impossible-to-navigate labyrinth that will achieve nothing except to deny Second Amendment rights to its citizens. The measure is an affront to civil liberties which belong to People, not to the state to grant on impossible and subjective criteria,” Keane added. 

The state has rushed to pass the measure, meaning no one will be able to buy a firearm beginning on December 8. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos