Senate GOP Is a Trainwreck...Because It's Still Loaded With Spineless Trash
Of Course, Hunter Biden Had This Take About the Trump Assassination Attempts
Judge Lets Principal Walk Free After Ignoring Six-Year-Old Carrying Gun Before Shooting Te...
You'll Never Guess Which Anti-Trumper Wants to Use Trump's Anti-Weaponization Fund
Senate Republicans Might Push Back on Two of Trump's Priorities
The New York Times Continues to Defend Its Despicable Anti-Israel Op-Ed
The Trolling of Mamdani Begins
Brutal New Ad Shows James Talarico Is Too Weak for Texas
Thom Tillis Shows Why GOP Voters Aren't Sad to See Him Leave Congress
Another Detransitioner Wins a Huge Settlement Against Her Therapists
Will Congress Finally Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent?
Here's the Ridiculous Reason One Democrat Is Calling for Boston's Mayor to Get...
After Attacking Pregnancy Centers, New Jersey's AG Is Now Targeting the State's Glock...
The Trump Administration Just Closed a Major Immigration Loophole
Greg Gutfeld Goes Off On the DNC's Joke of a 2024 Autopsy Report
Tipsheet

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon for Most Restrictive Gun Law in the Country

Another Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon for Most Restrictive Gun Law in the Country
AP Photo/Mary Altaffer

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), Oregon State Shooting Association (OSSA), and Mazama Sporting Goods filed a lawsuit against the state’s recently passed Ballot Measure 114, which is considered one of the strictest gun control laws in the country. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims that the measure infringes upon the right of Oregon residents to buy and own firearms, imposing “severe and unprecedented burdens on individuals seeking to exercise perhaps the most basic right guaranteed by the Second Amendment.”

This is the third lawsuit filed since November 8, which was filed by the Oregon Firearms Federation (OFF), Sherman County Sheriff’s Department, Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC).

“The deficiencies in this ballot measure cannot go unaddressed. Forget that it is scheduled to go into effect before Oregon even certifies the election, but it requires potential gun owners to take a class that has yet to be created, at a cost yet to be determined, so that they can obtain a permit that doesn’t permit them to purchase a firearm,” NRA Oregon state director Aoibheann Cline said in a statement to the Daily Caller. 

The strict measure will require residents to get background checks, firearm training (which does not currently exist), fingerprint collection, and a permit to purchase any firearm. 

The lawsuit also alleges that the measure creates a “Kafkaesque regime” which they claim is not supported by history, tradition, or modern regulation.

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT

“Oregon’s Measure 114 is blatantly unconstitutional,” NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane said, adding “the right to keep and bear arms begins with the ability of law-abiding citizens to be able to obtain a firearm through a lawful purchase at a firearm retailer.”

He also said that it threatens the most constitutional right… “Oregon has created an impossible-to-navigate labyrinth that will achieve nothing except to deny Second Amendment rights to its citizens. The measure is an affront to civil liberties which belong to People, not to the state to grant on impossible and subjective criteria,” Keane added. 

The state has rushed to pass the measure, meaning no one will be able to buy a firearm beginning on December 8. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement