Read a Venezuelan Guard's 'Chilling' Account About the Delta Force Raid That Nabbed...
Watch What Happens When This Leftist Protester Accosts a CNN Reporter in Minneapolis
Is This Why the Media Isn't Covering the Iran Protests?
Trump Is Minnesota's President, Too
Here's How Much Commie Mamdani's 'Affordable' Government Housing Will Cost You
Knoxville Orchestra Plays Sour Notes of Racial Preference over Talent
ICE Stories They Don’t Tell You
Kristi Noem Torches CNN’s Jake Tapper in Fiery Clash Over Minneapolis ICE Shooting
Miami Jury Convicts Two Executives in $34M Medicare Advantage Brace Fraud Scheme
Chinese National With Overstayed Visa Charged as Ringleader in Firearms Conspiracy
CNN Panel Sparks Firestorm After Abby Phillip Calls Somali Families 'Victims' of Minnesota...
Syrian Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $191K in U.S. Social Security Benefits
Leftist Agitators Stalk and Threaten to Kill Journalist Covering Minneapolis Unrest
Minneapolis Radicals Begin Distributing Devices to Disable ICE Vehicles
Sons of Liberty, Sons of Legacy: Forming the Men Who Will Shape America’s...
Tipsheet

Trump's Legal Team Reacts to Heavily Redacted Affidavit For First Time

AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura

A day after the affidavit was released, former President Trump’s legal team questioned the heavily redacted document, claiming that it has “raised more questions than answers.” 

Advertisement

Trump’s lawyers requested the motion for a “special master,” citing the unsealing of the redacted affidavit as a reason to the judge. His legal team said they want a neutral third party to be appointed to oversee the Department of Justice handling the evidence.

Roughly 20 out of the 38-page document was fully or almost entirely blacked out, while another 24 pages had a significant amount of information blacked out. 

The former president’s legal team argued that the redacted affidavit provides almost no reason to search Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. 

“The Redacted Affidavit underscores why this Motion should be granted, as it provides almost no information that would allow Movant to understand why the raid took place, or what was taken from his home," Trump’s attorneys wrote. 

“The few lines that are un-redacted raise more questions than answers. For instance, Paragraph 3 states, in pertinent part, as one of the bases for probable cause, that there ‘are Presidential records subject to record retention requirements currently remain[ing] at the PREMISES,” the legal team continued. 

Advertisement

Related:

TRUMP

Trump’s legal team said that not only was his Florida residence attacked, the affidavit proves that the raid on the former president’s home was “deeply troubling.” 

“This provides the deeply troubling prospect that President Trump’s home was raided under a pretense of a suspicion that Presidential records were on his property – even though the Presidential Records Act is not a criminally-enforceable statute,” the attorneys said. 

The heavily redacted affidavit provides key details that the attack on Trump’s home was unprecedented, and provided no reason to infringe upon his personal belongings. 

In a Truth Social Post following the document release, Trump expressed his rage for the judge who green lighted the raid, arguing that the judge never should have allowed the FBI to break into Trump’s home.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement