Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
A Tempest in a Locker Room: Taking a Sober Look at Kash Patel’s...
The Press Ignores an Assassination Attempt As the Huffington Post Takes the Gold...
The Atlantic Thinks Republicans Have a 'Nazi Problem'
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
Here's How the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling Exposes Liberal Justices Desire to Expand...
The Violence in Mexico Vindicates Trump’s Push to Treat Drug Cartels As Terrorists...
Gavin Newsom Doubles Down on His Racist Comments: It's 'Fake F**king Outrage'
The Canadian Cope Surrounding the Team USA Win Is Hilarious
Pressure Is Mounting Against Tony Gonzales. Will He Suspend His Campaign?
Mexican Special Forces Kill Mastermind Behind Cartel Terrorism Outbreak
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Limited Government, Lasting Opportunity
Tipsheet

Dianne Feinstein Is Headed Back to the Senate

Dianne Feinstein Is Headed Back to the Senate
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

After an absence due to shingles that spanned several months, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is headed back to Washington, D.C., as first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle. The report noted that "Feinstein boarded a chartered private plane Tuesday, according to sources close to the senator," and that they confirmed her departure with Feinstein's spokesperson Adam Russell. 

Advertisement

Other outlets have since reported on and confirmed Feinstein being on the move. 

Feinstein's return comes despite and perhaps in defiance of those who called on her to resign, including some of her Democratic colleagues in Congress, such as Rep. Ro Khanna, who also represents California. 

Democratic-friendly outlets also issued similar calls. Last Friday, The New York Times published an editorial, "Dianne Feinstein Has to Act." 

"If she cannot fulfill her obligations to the Senate and to her constituents, she should resign and turn over her responsibilities to an appointed successor," the editorial read at one point. It only got more forceful from there as it also sought to downplay how her return was expected and hoped to come soon. 

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Those issuing such calls for Feinstein to resign have pointed to how her absence was supposedly holding up the confirmation of judicial nominees, though the senator's office released a fact-check last week about such claims, just before the editorial referenced above was published. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) had also pointed out that it's only the most liberal, radical nominees who can't get confirmed. 

During his recent Sunday morning appearance on CNN's "State of the Union," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) had expressed anxiety to host Jake Tapper about the consequences of Feinstein failing to return soon, though he hoped she would be back. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), whose notes from last week showed that this would be the timeline of when Feinstein would return, has indicated Feinstein appears to be ready to be back at work in the Senate.

Advertisement

Feinstein had indicated last December that she planned to finish out her term, but her office also indicated in February that she would not run for reelection in 2024. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement