Here's What We Learned From Virginia's Election Results
It Is a Week of Scandals Involving Reporters and Parties Involving News Outlets
Does the Right Still Believe in 'No More Souters'?
Faith Rebound: Signs of Spiritual Awakening Continue As Gen Z Turns to God,...
Connecticut House Passes Controversial Gun Control Bill
There Is a Reason Why There Are So Few Great Men Today
The New York Times Finds a Glamorous Backer of Theft and Murder
All Redistricting Reformers Are Hypocrites
Trump Cuts FDA Red Tape on Ibogaine: Veterans Finally Get a Real Shot...
Kansas Legislature Shows Rest of Nation How to Get Good Things Done
Chicago Public Schools and Mayor Brandon Johnson Declare ‘Day of Civic Action’ on...
Trump and Tennessee Republicans Are Delivering Affordable Energy
FBI, DEA Seize 120 Pounds of Meth, 25 Guns in Massive Mexican Mafia...
School Food Director Charged With Stealing Lunches From Kids to Stock His Beach...
Army Soldier Charged With Using Classified Intel on Maduro Raid to Win $409K...
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation
AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement