Iran's Days Are Numbered
Thom Tillis' Dog Show Was a Public Relations Fiasco...and It Might Have Muddied...
Another US Women's Hockey Player Tosses Cold Water on Media's Narrative About the...
Watch Brady Tkachuk Masterfully Handle the Loser Canadian Media Regarding Trump's Joke
Should John Fetterman Consider Switching Parties? It Makes Sense, But There's a Catch
Pronoun Twitter Will Melt Down Over How Members of the Men's Hockey Team...
US Women's Hockey Team Is Pretty Much Telling the Media to Get a...
Maryland Sheriffs Blast Democrats for Obstructing ICE Cooperation
Philly Is Being Sued by Five Police Officers. Here's Why.
My State of the Union Bucket List Evening
The America the Left Loves — and Hates
The U.S. Olympic Men's Hockey Team Did It the Right Way
They Always Underestimate America
The Press vs. America
To Achieve American Energy Dominance, All We Needed Was a New President
Tipsheet

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation

Grand Jury Indicts Dem Attorney in Durham Investigation
AP Photo/Bob Child, File

On Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that a federal grand jury indicted attorney Michael Sussmann in a charge that he had lied to the FBI about a client. The indictment was expected, after a report from The New York Times revealed it was coming as part of the Durham investigation. 

Advertisement

The New York Times reported about the announcement on Thursday, in a piece from Charlie Savage. 

Catherine Herridge of CBS News shared details as well and provided a link to the 27 page indictment which was signed by Durham. 

Wednesday's report noted that the statute of limitations means Durham had until this weekend to bring charges. However, there is still much that is unclear.

As Savage reported:

It remains unclear whether Mr. Durham is drafting some kind of lengthy report intended for public consumption, akin to the one Mr. Mueller produced. Out of office, Mr. Trump has repeatedly issued statements fuming, “Where’s Durham?”

The current attorney general, Merrick B. Garland, said at his confirmation hearing in February that he would let Mr. Durham continue to work, but was noncommittal about the details, including how he would handle any final report if Mr. Durham submitted one.

Funding for most Justice Department operations, like much of the federal government, is controlled by an annual budget that covers a fiscal year that begins on Oct. 1 and ends on Sept. 30.

Spokesmen for Mr. Garland and Mr. Durham have declined to comment in response to questions about whether Mr. Durham’s office has funding approval to continue operating after Sept. 30.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos