Dirty Words Trump Dirty Deeds for the Next SCOTUS Pick
Here Is One of the Toads Running As a Democrat This Year
Award Season Idiocy
Artificial Intelligence: The 'Tokyo Rose' of the Iran war
We've Seen This Movie Before
Christ Is King. Stop Using His Name in Vain.
Hooray, Hollywood Is History
The Day Ronald Reagan Walked Into an Irish Pub
The Left’s Hypocritical Attacks and Doxxing of ICE
Minnesota Elections Official Finally Admits What We All Knew About Illegals Voting
Energy Secretary Chris Wright Says U.S. Acting to Offset Temporary Oil Price Spike...
5 Sentenced for Fraud Ring That Used Shell Companies and Stolen Cards in...
Here's How the Policies of the Radical Left Set an Islamic Terrorist Loose...
Israel: Michigan Terrorist’s Brother Was Hezbollah Commander
Trump: US Has 'Beaten and Completely Decimated' Iran 'Both Militarily, Economically, and E...
Tipsheet

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate

Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers a Blow to Gov. Tony Evers' Pandemic Mandate
AP Photo/Scott Bauer

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a blow to Democrat Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) by striking down his statewide mask mandate; the court concluded that Evers overstepped his executive authority by authorizing a renewal of the mandate unilaterally. 

Advertisement

Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that the court believes that Evers did not act in compliance of the law by issuing mandates that exceed his authority as governor.

"The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not."

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of three justices in the minority on the court, argued that wide-reaching mandates fall within the governor's power to protect citizens.

“We are in the midst of a worldwide pandemic that so far has claimed the lives of over a half million people in this country. And with the stakes so high, the majority not only arrives at erroneous conclusions, but it also obscures the consequence of its decision. Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority’s decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19," she wrote in a dissenting opinion to Wednesday's ruling.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s ruling is not the first setback for Evers regarding COVID restrictions. In May, the court struck down the governor’s “safer at home” edict, ruling that he did not have the power to issue such an executive order.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement