Jemele Hill Can't Be Serious With This Take About the Circus Engulfing Dianna...
Sen. Kennedy Wasn't Sure He Was Going to Say This on the Senate...
Justice Jackson Was the Lone Dissenter in This Case, and She Was Not...
Iranian Supreme Leader Sidelined as Military Takes More Control
Trump Torches Legacy Media Outlets for Lying About Iran War
President Trump Responds to Tim Cook's Announcement He's Stepping Down As Apple CEO
Hakeem Jeffries Used the Bible to Justify Disenfranchising Virginia Voters
ActBlue’s Legal Troubles Are Mounting
Tom Steyer Might Be California's Next Governor, and He Once Wanted President Trump...
This Wrong Way Driver Killed an LA Sheriff Recruit, Injured Several Others. He'll...
Kamala Harris Has Adopted Another Fake Accent
Senator Chris Murphy Is Rooting for Iran and Here's the Proof
PNC Steps Up for Pittsburgh's NFL Draft
Here's What Was on That Seized Iranian Tanker
Gutfeld Blasts Gov Tim Walz As a 'Traitor' for Attacking Trump on Foreign...
Tipsheet

Watch: Rep. Elise Stefanik Schools Opponent on Court Packing

Watch: Rep. Elise Stefanik Schools Opponent on Court Packing
AP Photo/Mike Groll, File

In the final general election debate before voters head to the polls, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R, NY-21) torched her Democrat challenger, Tedra Cobb, on potential for court packing. Cobb previously dodged questions about expanding the size of the Supreme Court, and told debate moderators that she would “maybe” consider supporting court packing if the Senate confirms Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the high court.

Advertisement

“The honest answer to that [court packing] is maybe. I don’t want to do that. It is legal and it is constitutional, but I don’t want to do that,” Cobb said. “Unfortunately, right now in Washington, Mitch McConnell, this Administration and enablers like Elise Stefanik have pushed through this nomination...so no, I don’t want to do that, but the answer is maybe.”

Rep. Stefanik did her proper homework, and reminded voters that earlier this week, Cobb failed to realize that she would be compelled to vote on court packing legislation if elected to the House of Representatives. The New York congresswoman took Cobb to school on the constitutionality of filling Supreme Court vacancies, and made her stance on court packing clear.

“When it comes to the constitutional duty to fill and nominate an individual to the Supreme Court, I support the president’s right to put forth a name and I support the Senate’s position to advise and consent,” Rep. Stefanik said. “My opponent should answer that question for North Country voters. I would vote no on efforts to pack the court.”

Advertisement

Watch the full interaction below:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement