What the Hell Happened to This Show?
Jimmy Kimmel: Fake Progressive Hero Of The Year
Some of Us May Die, But It's a Sacrifice Democrats Are Willing to...
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 300: Praise God for 300! It Began Because...
Minnesota: Exporting Wealth, Importing Pirates
Lebanon at a Crossroads: Time to Cut the Iranian Cord
How Do We Know When We’re Winning? Just Read the New York Times
We Need to Be Reminded Once Again that Jesus Was Not a Palestinian
'Mental Health' or 'Evil': It Can’t be Both
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas Presents
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Tipsheet

WaPo Editorial Board: Biden Should Address Tara Reade's Claims Directly

AP Photo/Matt Rourke

The debacle over Tara Reade’s allegations of sexual misconduct against former Vice President Joe Biden took a turn on Wednesday night. Mainstream media outlets have run interference for the former vice president, as Democrats turn a blind eye to Reade’s claims. The Washington Post was at the center of the Biden damage control effort:

Advertisement

WaPo’s editorial board pivoted from the paper’s original tone toward Reade’s allegations, and now calls on the former vice president to directly address Reade’s claims. Thus far, Biden’s campaign has categorically denied the charges, while Biden’s confidants keep the former vice president hidden from scrutiny. Also hidden is the entirety of then-Senator Biden’s records related to his career in the upper chamber, which totaled 36 years; information confirming Reade’s story, or proving it to be false, could be present in the records, as WaPo notes:

“These could contain confirmation of any complaint Ms. Reade made, either through official congressional channels or to the three other employees she claims she informed not specifically of the alleged assault but more generally of harassment. They could also contain nothing of the sort. Insisting on an inventory doesn’t mean one believes Ms. Reade or doesn’t believe her. It signals only a desire for the public to know all that’s able to be known, which ought to be in everyone’s interest,” the editorial board writes.

Advertisement

Related:

JOE BIDEN

The board also addressed Biden’s silence in particular; the candidate himself has not said a word, or been asked a single question about, Reade’s claims, despite claiming to believe and respect women who make such allegations:

“Mr. Biden may have little to say besides what his campaign has already said — that he did not do this, and that this is not something he ever would do. Yet the way to signal he takes Ms. Reade’s case seriously, and the cases of women like her seriously, is to go before the media and the public ready to listen and to reply.”

The Biden campaign sent another set of instructive talking points to campaign surrogates, after the first set was published on Monday

The former vice president’s advisors tell allies to insist that major news organizations, including WaPo and The New York Times, have deemed Biden innocent, but NYT refutes the Biden campaign’s claim that the newspaper exonerated him:

Advertisement

The former vice president cannot hide from these allegations until November, and given his previous rhetoric on this issue and commitment to believing women, Biden should address Reade’s claim directly. 

Editor's Note: Want to support Townhall so we can keep telling the truth about Joe Biden? Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code CREEPYJOE to get 25% off VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement