Tipsheet

Radical: Senate Dems Overwhelmingly Support Nationwide Law Imposing Abortion-on-Demand For All Nine Months

Guy Benson
Guy Benson  |  March 01, 2022 10:05 AM

As Rebecca covered last night, Senate Democrats returned from their recess and their first order of business -- in the midst of multiple bona fide crises, mind you -- was to bring up a truly radical, majority-opposed measure that would have imposed a national law legalizing abortion-on-demand throughout all nine months of pregnancy.  That's not a distortion or an exaggeration. There's 'pro-choice,' then there's this pro-abortion monstrosity:

The WHPA is an effort to “codify Roe,” not only declaring abortion a fundamental right — for any reason, throughout all of pregnancy — but also nullifying any state law that prohibits or regulates abortion. The bill would forbid state laws protecting unborn children after they’re old enough to survive outside the womb. It would nullify bans on abortions chosen for discriminatory reasons, such as the unborn child’s sex or diagnosis with a disability. It would prohibit even the most modest regulations such as informed-consent laws, waiting periods, ultrasound requirements, and even safety standards for abortion clinics.

"Safe, legal and rare" is long gone within Democratic dogma.  Increasing safety standards at clinics could save women's lives, but such details might get in the way of more abortions taking place, so such state-level requirements would be barred under the Democrats' bill.  More sickening details:

Creating a right to abortion “all the way through pregnancy” in all 50 states is exactly what the WHPA does. The bill creates an absolute right to abortion prior to fetal viability — that is, prior to the point at which a baby can likely survive outside the womb — and prevents state laws from protecting a baby’s life after viability whenever a single “health-care provider” determines that the continuation of the pregnancy “would pose a risk” to the mother’s life or “health.” The bill’s chief Senate sponsor, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, has acknowledged that it “doesn’t distinguish” between physical and psychological health...As [pro-choice Republican] Senator Susan Collins told the Los Angeles Times while announcing her opposition in September, the WHPA would “severely weaken the [conscience] exceptions that are in the current law,” eliminating protections and defenses afforded to health-care providers and by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as no federal law has ever done before. The bill also enshrines a right for non-doctors to perform abortions, even after viability.

If someone wanted to abort her late-term, viable unborn daughter in month eight after deciding that the notion of having a girl instead of a boy constituted an undue tax upon her "mental health," that 'choice' would not only be legal in all 50 states -- a non-doctor could perform the deadly procedure.  Perhaps that's a far-fetched illustration, perhaps not.  Conscience protections for healthcare professionals who object to abortion would also be gutted.  Democrats also want to scrap the longstanding 'Hyde Amendment' compromise and force taxpayers to fund abortions.  As I said, this is extreme pro-abortion zealotry.  It's the equivalent of Congressional Republicans introducing a bill that would outlaw all abortions from the moment of conception, with no exceptions whatsoever, including to save the life of the mother.  Many in the GOP would oppose such a bill, which would undoubtedly generate a high-decibel media firestorm, given how ideologically biased most journalists are on this particular issue.

Yet House Democrats passed this grotesque legislation with little attention or fanfare (outside of the abortion lobby, which effectively forced the vote) last fall.  Every single Democratic member of Nancy Pelosi's caucus, save one, voted in favor -- including alleged 'moderates' running for Senate like Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania and Tim Ryan of Ohio. Last night was the Senate's turn.  It appears there are precisely two Democrats in all of Congress (Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas and Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia) who oppose unlimited, taxpayer-funded, full-term elective abortion-on-demand:


Vulnerable 2022 Democratic incumbents from Arizona's Mark Kelly, to New Hampshire's Maggie Hassan, to Nevada's Catherine Cortez Masto all lined up to vote with Chuck Schumer to advance this breathtaking measure.  So did this guy:


All Republicans, including pro-choice ones, opposed it, along with Manchin.  The failed bill received the backing of 99 percent (264 of 266) of voting Congressional Democrats.  Its contents represent the views of...17 percent of the American people, according to a poll released earlier this year:

Recommended

Georgia Conducted a Hand Count Audit of Its Election Results. Guess What it Found? Guy Benson
Tom Cotton Issues 'Friendly Reminder' to ICC After Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant Leah Barkoukis


I summarized public opinion on the issue of abortion late last year (this is based on data, not my opinion, which is generally pro-life):


We can debate whether various state-level abortion restrictions are out of the mainstream (statutes in places like Mississippi and soon Florida fall within US and international norms, whereas other policies are more extreme) -- but few approach the pro-abortion radicalism in states like Oregon, which national Democrats have now voted to inflict upon the entire country.  Back in 2003, when George W. Bush was president, a late-term 'partial-birth' abortion ban passed the Senate by a 30-vote margin, with almost 20 Democrats voting in favor of the restriction.  One of them was Joe Biden, who is now this Joe Biden.  Abortion extremism has since become a special interest-driven litmus test within the Democratic Party, enforced by the journalist class:  


The only people standing in the way of said extremism are voters.