The Terrorist Who Attacked New Orleans Was Recently Radicalized and Went Insane in...
About Those Four Individuals Allegedly Planting Explosives Around the French Quarter
Tesla Cybertruck Bomber Identified. Here's Where There Might Be a Connection to the...
The FBI’s Final Humiliation Came on New Year’s Day
How My 2024 Predictions Went – And Some Predictions for 2025
Top 5 People in Politics in 2024
Jimmy Carter's Faith
The Airbnb the Bourbon Street Terrorist Rented Caught on Fire
There Is One Reason Why the Las Vegas Explosion Outside Trump Hotel Didn't...
Trump May Have Been Joking, But Here's Why 'Shark Tank' Star Is Very...
Why Do Terrorists Rarely Hit China?
Thinking Big as Trump, Congress Could Tackle Taxes
Pro-Hamas Protestors Call for 'Intifada Revolution' Following New Orleans Terror Attack
The Palestinians Deserve Everything They Get
Celebrating the Miracles of Hanukkah
Tipsheet

Sotomayor Overturned 9-0, Ricci Overturned 5-4

A commentary piece in The National Journal sheds new light on the importance of the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to overturn Ricci v. DeStefano. Author Stuart Taylor Jr. explains:
Advertisement
The Supreme Court's predictable 5-4 vote to reverse the decision... does not by itself prove that the Sotomayor position was unreasonable... What's more striking is that the court was unanimous in rejecting the Sotomayor panel's specific holding. Her holding was that New Haven's decision to spurn the test results must be upheld based solely on the fact that highly disproportionate numbers of blacks had done badly on the exam and might file a "disparate-impact" lawsuit -- regardless of whether the exam was valid or the lawsuit could succeed.
Taylor points out that even liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who authored the dissent, objected to Sotomayor's opinion that disparate racial results alone justified the city of New Haven for throwing out the results of the exam. Read the full piece here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos