I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
DHS Slaps Down Baltimore Sun Over Fake News About Recent ICE Arrest
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
This Is What Marco Rubio Said When Asked About North Korea
Baltimore Mayor Tried to Stop Watchdog Investigation – Now He's Facing a Lawsuit
CA Judge Steps in Allowing 20,000 Illegal Alien Truck Drivers to Remain on...
The State of the Union – A Win Is a Win
Democrats Smell Blood in Texas, but Republicans Are Ready
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Vice President Vance Destroyed Tony Evers for Refusing to Help Clean Up Fraud...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
Gavin Newsom Reveals Which Potential Heir to the MAGA Movement 'Scares' Him The...
Gutfeld Says Democrats’ Ego Cost Them at State of the Union
Tipsheet

DOJ Ordered to Turn Over Fani Willis Files

DOJ Ordered to Turn Over Fani Willis Files
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

In another legal victory for Judicial Watch, a federal court has ordered the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to furnish all available files they have on any communications between now-former Special Counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis pertaining to the prosecution of President Donald Trump.

Advertisement

The court order comes after the DOJ still objected to handing over information even after the Trump prosecutions were shut down.

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich ruled on January 28 that because the two federal cases against Trump were closed, the DOJ's non-disclosure arguments are no longer applicable:

Since [the] DOJ filed its motion for summary judgment and supporting Declaration in March 2024, the Special Counsel's criminal enforcement actions have been terminated [...] The cases are 'closed—not pending or contemplated—and therefore are not proceedings with which disclosure may interfere' [...] Thus, the agency’s sole justification for invoking the Glomar doctrine under Exemption 7(A) is no longer applicable.

Accordingly, the Court will deny DOJ’s motion for summary judgment and grant the plaintiff's cross motion. DOJ is directed to process the plaintiff's FOIA request and either 'disclose any [responsive] records or establish both that their contents are exempt from disclosure and that such exemption has not also been waived.'

Advertisement

Related:

PRESIDENT TRUMP

Judicial Watch sued in October 2023 after the DOJ failed to comply with an August 2023 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for records relating to Willis asking for and/or receiving federal funds or other assistance in any form regarding the investigation of Trump and his allies.

Then that December, the DOJ issued a final response to this request, in which they refused to confirm or deny the existence of relevant records, claiming that releasing these records "could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings," specifically the special counsel's then-ongoing prosecutions. Furthermore, DOJ officials refused to change their position or inform the court in light of the department's decision to toss out the criminal proceedings against Trump.

Now, the DOJ must meet with Judicial Watch on or before February 21, 2025, as well as report the status of their discussion to the court.

"President Trump truly needs to overhaul the Justice Department from top to bottom," Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a press release. "It is a scandal that a federal court had to order the Justice Department to admit the truth that their objections to producing records about collusion with Fani Willis had no basis in reality."

Last month, a Fulton County judge ordered Willis to pay Judicial Watch over $21,500 in attorney's fees and litigation expenses for flouting the state's public records law.

Advertisement

In December, the same Superior Court found that Willis violated Georgia's Open Records Act (ORA) in a lawsuit brought by the government watchdog group. Under court order, Willis ultimately admitted to wrongly withholding records that Judicial Watch had repeatedly requested. "Non-compliance has consequences. One of them can be [financial] liability," the judge chastised Willis, like covering costs of litigation.

Judicial Watch launched the open records lawsuit after Willis lied about not possessing any records responsive to a request seeking all communications she may have had with Smith's office and/or the House select January 6 committee.

According to Fitton, Judicial Watch recently received payment from Willis. "We got the Fani Willis check last week," Fitton tweeted. "But we really want the documents!"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos