Trump’s Texas Deal Dilemma
Trump Declares Victory in Iran War
You're Going to Laugh at This Reuters Piece About Operation Epic Fury
The Negotiations to Reopen the Department of Homeland Security Are NOT Going Well
Kid Whose Family Was Nearly Wiped Out by Unhinged Trans Shooter Just Had...
Here's What an Israeli Pilot Said to His American Counterpart Before a Bombing...
It’s Not Islamophobia, It’s Islamo-I’m-Sick-of-Hearing-About-It
What If Those Iranian Bombs Had Nuclear Warheads
Between a Mullah and a Hard Place
Obama's Race-Hustling Eulogy at a Race Hustler's Funeral
The Religious, the Secular and the Truth
Democrats’ Latest Sacrificial Pawns
If Virginia Is for Lovers, There Is No Place for Tyrants
Florida Teens Accused of Plotting to Kill Classmate to Resurrect Sandy Hook Shooter
Farm Labor Company Operator Pleads Guilty to RICO Charge in Worker Exploitation Case
Tipsheet

Chair of Judiciary Committee Defends Constitutional Merits of Obamacare

Chair of Judiciary Committee Defends Constitutional Merits of Obamacare
The very same representative who once famously asked "What good is reading the [health care] bill?" is now defending the measure against claims that Obamacare is unconstitutional.  With his infinite wisdom, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House
Advertisement
Judiciary Committee, defended the constitutional merits of Obamacare on the grounds of the "good and welfare clause" and "a couple others."

Hmmm... I'm not familiar with the "good and welfare" clause.  But Rep. Conyers assures us it's legit because "scholars" he knows say so:   



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement