The FBI Used One Word That's Likely to Draw More Criticism in Latest...
The Terrorist Who Attacked New Orleans Was Recently Radicalized and Went Insane in...
About Those Four Individuals Allegedly Planting Explosives Around the French Quarter
Police Just Raided Yet Another Eric Adams Ally
Republicans Poised to Change House Speaker Rules and Democrats Are Not Happy About...
Spree Shooter Kills 12 in Montenegro Before Turning Gun on Himself
Why Security Bollards Were Not Raised on Bourbon Street During New Year's Day...
The Airbnb the Bourbon Street Terrorist Rented Caught on Fire
There Is One Reason Why the Las Vegas Explosion Outside Trump Hotel Didn't...
Trump May Have Been Joking, But Here's Why 'Shark Tank' Star Is Very...
Newsom Applauded One of Trump's Immigration Stances
Hamas May Want to Release the Hostages After This Latest Warning Message
Biden Will Award Liz Cheney With This Medal
Flashback: That Other Time a Damning Photo of a Democrat Was Also Suppressed
'You White B*tches, Go Back to Europe!': Pro-Hamas Protestors Descend on NYC
Tipsheet

EPA Unveils Timetable for Regulating Greenhouse Gases

Forget Congress.  Forget cap-and-trade (for now).  The Environmental Protection Agency is going ahead with its own plans to regulate emissions.  While the nation's attention is focused on health care this week, the
Advertisement
Washington Post reports that EPA administrator Lisa Jackson plans to begin targeting "large facilities" like power plants starting next year:
[In a letter to legislators, Jackson] outlined, major emitters of carbon dioxide that are already seeking air-pollution permits would face regulation as early as the start of 2011. Medium-size emitters such as a large liquor distillery would not face restrictions until the second half of 2011 at the earliest, and smaller facilities such as dry cleaners and hospitals wouldn't come under the rules until 2016.
[# More #]

Jackson also wrote that an effort by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to block the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases would undo a deal struck last year between the auto industry, the administration and several states to limit greenhouse gases from cars and light trucks.

David Doniger, policy director of the climate center at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, said the letter shows that "carbon pollution can be controlled under the Clean Air Act in an effective and reasonable way."

"The EPA's reaffirming their intent is to carry out the existing law as defined under the Clean Air Act," he said. "That's their job, until and unless Congress passes a new law."

Advertisement

But Jeffrey R. Holmstead, a lawyer at Bracewell & Giuliani who represents several companies that would be regulated under Jackson's plan, said the administration does not need to act this quickly and could accomplish some of the same goals by simply tightening fuel-economy standards for automobiles.

"The way that she is proposing to do this will be litigated every step of the way," said Holmstead, who has advised Murkowski. "There's nothing that requires they regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars or trucks this year or next year, or the year after. They clearly have enormous discretion in figuring out the timing of any regulation."

Apparently the Obama administration can't think of any better time to drive consumer costs up than during an economic recession...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement