The Woman in the Empty Suit
FEMA Officials Ordered Relief Workers to Skip Hurricane-Ravaged Houses With Trump Signs
Dem Strategist Explains How Her Party Got Brutalized in 2024
Pentagon Brass Held Secret Meetings About How to Countermand Trump's Orders
We Have Another CNN Meltdown for the Ages
With Trump Win, an 'Urgent Conversation Is Blowing Up' in Dem Circles About...
Why the Democrats Really Lost
The Hamas-Hezbollah-Iran-UN Axis of Evil
Kamala Harris' Election Eve Concerts Did Nothing But Put Her Campaign In Debt
The Office of Citizen - Guardians of Meaning
Restoring America's Economic Prosperity: How President-Elect Trump Can Lead Us Forward
Trump Won, Day One: Protect the Children: America's Lost Migrant Children Crisis
How Trump Can Start Draining the Swamp
Trump’s Victory Establishes the GOP as the Tariff Party
Restore America's Freedom to Innovate
Tipsheet

EPA Unveils Timetable for Regulating Greenhouse Gases

Forget Congress.  Forget cap-and-trade (for now).  The Environmental Protection Agency is going ahead with its own plans to regulate emissions.  While the nation's attention is focused on health care this week, the
Advertisement
Washington Post reports that EPA administrator Lisa Jackson plans to begin targeting "large facilities" like power plants starting next year:
[In a letter to legislators, Jackson] outlined, major emitters of carbon dioxide that are already seeking air-pollution permits would face regulation as early as the start of 2011. Medium-size emitters such as a large liquor distillery would not face restrictions until the second half of 2011 at the earliest, and smaller facilities such as dry cleaners and hospitals wouldn't come under the rules until 2016.
[# More #]

Jackson also wrote that an effort by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to block the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases would undo a deal struck last year between the auto industry, the administration and several states to limit greenhouse gases from cars and light trucks.

David Doniger, policy director of the climate center at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, said the letter shows that "carbon pollution can be controlled under the Clean Air Act in an effective and reasonable way."

"The EPA's reaffirming their intent is to carry out the existing law as defined under the Clean Air Act," he said. "That's their job, until and unless Congress passes a new law."

Advertisement

But Jeffrey R. Holmstead, a lawyer at Bracewell & Giuliani who represents several companies that would be regulated under Jackson's plan, said the administration does not need to act this quickly and could accomplish some of the same goals by simply tightening fuel-economy standards for automobiles.

"The way that she is proposing to do this will be litigated every step of the way," said Holmstead, who has advised Murkowski. "There's nothing that requires they regulate greenhouse gas emissions from cars or trucks this year or next year, or the year after. They clearly have enormous discretion in figuring out the timing of any regulation."

Apparently the Obama administration can't think of any better time to drive consumer costs up than during an economic recession...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement