It's Election Day in North Carolina and Texas. Here's What to Watch
Here's What Someone Should've Said to Thom Tillis During His Kristi Noem Meltdown
Top Dem Was Asked About Nancy Pelosi's Past Remarks About Unilateral Bombings...and It...
OpenAI Adds Surveillance Ban in Deal With Pentagon
Guess How Many Iranian Targets the US and Israel Hit Within 72 Hours
'Diversity' Is a Formula for Failure
Another Somali Fraudster Just Pleaded Guilty to Stealing $6M in Autism Center Scheme
Trump, Forever Wars and Iraq Syndrome
Outrage Erupts Over Kentucky Gun Store's Opening, Now Do Mosques
Don't Let Congress Ruin College Sports
Megyn Kelly Claims US Troops Who Died in Operation Epic Fury Died for...
Roy Cooper and Mark Whatley Advance to Highly-Contested Senate Race in North Carolina
The Department of War Has Released the Identities of Four of the Heroes...
CIA-Backed Kurdish Militias Will Launch Ground Campaign in Iran Soon
Iran Has Reportedly Chosen Their Next Supreme Leader, but He Might Already Be...
Tipsheet

You Can See Why That Anti-ICE Lawsuit Filed by Minnesota Was Such a Crock

You Can See Why That Anti-ICE Lawsuit Filed by Minnesota Was Such a Crock
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Dmitri had something on this earlier today: Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison defended the leftist storming of a church service in the state as an act of free speech. It is not, especially when it was a mob action: these clowns thought an ICE agent was inside. The priest was even accused of working with federal law enforcement. It was all captured on video, thanks to Don Lemon, who might be facing charges for FACE Act violations. The Department of Justice is investigating the matter.  

Advertisement

Ellison said this was protected First Amendment activity. It’s certainly not. Does he even know what the FACE (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances) Act is? It’s not exclusive to abortion clinics, Keith:

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit: (1) intentionally injuring, intimidating, or interfering with, or attempting to injure, intimidate, or interfere, any person by force, threat of force, or physical obstruction because that person is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from, obtaining or providing reproductive health services; (2) intentionally injuring, intimidating, or interfering with, or attempting to injure, intimidate, or interfere, any person by force, threat of force, or physical obstruction exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or (3) intentionally damaging or destroying the property of a facility, or attempting to do so, because such facility provides reproductive health services, or intentionally damaging or destroying the property of a place of religious worship.

Sets maximum dollar amounts of fines (including for exclusively nonviolent physical obstruction) and maximum imprisonment terms. Includes in the available civil remedies injunctive relief, compensatory and punitive damages, and costs.

Advertisement

Sort of explains why his anti-ICE lawsuit is such a crock. Even CNN’s top legal analyst, Elie Honig, picked it apart in mere seconds, adding that it would go against the supremacy clause, among other things, namely the enforcement of federal immigration laws, so it has no chance.  

The state is being targeted for its diversity—this isn’t an MSNBC segment, man. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Please support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join TOWNHALL VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement