FINALLY: The DHS Shutdown Is Coming to an End...Sort of
This Reporter Was Left With Severe Burns After Asking Trump This Question About...
Here's What We Should Expect From Trump's Address on Iran Tonight
Animal Rights Movement Seeks to Jail Hunters and Fishermen With This Measure
This Librarian Was Willing to Lose Her Job Because She Wanted Children to...
Social Media Is Having Way Too Much Fun With the KitKat Heist
Four Dangerous State Bills Paving the Path to Infanticide
WaPo Goes on Defense for Eric Swalwell...for Some Reason, and NY Times Brags...
President Trump Has Already Won on Birthright Citizenship
Roy Cooper’s Donor List Has an Epstein Problem
You Won’t Believe Justice Jackson’s Arguments Against Ending Birthright Citizenship
California Sues the Trump Administration to Block an Executive Order Targeting Mail-In Bal...
In Today's NBA, Beliefs Can Be a Firing Offense
Ex-Staffer Blows Whistle on Michigan U.S. Senate Candidate’s Foreign Policy Views
Massachusetts Man Charged With Threatening President Trump on Facebook
Tipsheet

MS Now Host Wonders Why Trump Was So Against Releasing the Epstein Files. Did You See Today's Update?

MS Now Host Wonders Why Trump Was So Against Releasing the Epstein Files. Did You See Today's Update?
AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File

Of course, they did this right before Christmas: The Justice Department drops another tranche of Epstein files, and it’s marinated with a healthy dose of crazy. It’s not that we didn’t know this was coming, not least because of Congress’ vote last month, which forced the department to release the files. Trump greenlit it. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles read them—there’s nothing there. But that didn’t stop Democrats and third-rate liberal outlets from seizing upon the documents to allege, among other things, that Trump and the late New York financier Jeff Epstein engaged in a gang rape of an alleged victim. Still, they didn’t read the full tip.  

Advertisement

It’s insanity, folks:

Just days ago, MS Now’s Joe Scarbrough wondered why Trump was so against the release of these documents if nothing was incriminating. Joe, it’s a multi-tiered answer: It baits the liberal media into obsessing about a story that he knows will end up blowing up in their faces. Yet we also knew the files were rife with misinformation, including bad/crazy tips and ludicrous allegations that cannot be verified. That’s the part that’s the hoax, folks.  

Advertisement

That Democrats are going to use anything that makes Trump look bad and claim it’s legitimate when it’s not. I mean, this postcard to Larry Nassar, the infamous physician who raped numerous American gymnasts, which the FBI failed to investigate because they were too busy trying to get Trump, was postmarked by Epstein on August 13, 2019. Epstein died on August 10, and it was mailed from Northern Virginia: 

If anything, it shows why they shouldn’t have been released since there are tips and files here that are facially inaccurate. But lure the media, make them double down, and then ruin them. It worked with Russian collusion and almost anything Trump-related, so go in for the kill. 

It’s a massive file dump that libs think contains smoking guns, but it’s rotten meat, which is fitting for a massive order of nothing burgers. 

                                                                                     ***

Advertisement

UPDATE: Yeah, the postcard is fake, but that hasn't stopped the liberal media, lefty influencers, and Democrats from peddling total fake news.

Editor’s NoteDo you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Please support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  

Join TOWNHALL VIP and use the promo code MERRY74 for 74% off your VIP membership!

Merry Christmas!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement