No Way Adam Schiff Used That Phrase to Describe the Narco-Terrorists We're Blowing...
Jasmine Crockett Just Made a Huge Move–How Will It Pan Out?
State Attorney General Pressures City to Cancel Christmas-Themed Drag Show
Indiana University Sanctions Lecturer for Claiming MAGA Is White Supremacy
Top Trump Prosecutor Resigns After Appeals Court Ruling
Rest in Peace, Chronicles of Narnia
Democrats Just Proposed Legislation to Make Plane Tickets More Expensive
Man of the People Mamdani to Move Into Swanky Gracie Mansion
President Trump Announces $12B in Farm Subsidies
Greenpeace Seeks to Undermine US Law in a Dutch Court
New Jersey City Buckles Under After Lawsuit Challenging Illegal Gun Confiscation
Some Cultures Shouldn't Be Welcomed in the US
Tom Homan Destroys Dana Bash After She Accuses ICE of Racial Profiling in...
Seattle to Host LGBTQ+ Pride Match For FIFA World Cup Featuring Egypt and...
Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump Admin in Landmark FTC Firing Case
Tipsheet

The NYT Had to Post a Brutal Correction in Their Piece About Charlie Kirk

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Charlie Kirk was assassinated on Wednesday. He was 31. Kirk was struck in the neck by an assassin’s bullet while doing his Q&A session, a mainstay of his college campus activism, at Utah Valley University in Orem. Whether you liked him or despised him, his impact on American politics was pervasive. He broke down the blue walls around college campuses, breaking through with young men who are now decidedly Republican with their political views. He had a national constituency, who no doubt could’ve been formidable enough for a presidential run.

Advertisement

Now, he’s gone. But even after he’s passed, he’s still owning the institutional Left. Take The New York Times, which had to issue an embarrassing correction after calling Kirk an antisemite. The piece is a hit piece disguised as a quasi-listicle, and that topic was on the list (via NYT):

Mr. Kirk also accused Jewish philanthropists of fomenting anti-whiteness by supporting liberal antiracism causes like the Black Lives Matter movement.

“The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country,” he said on his show in 2023. 

Not long after, he accused Jews of controlling “not just the colleges — it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.” 

Allies of Mr. Kirk often sought to defend him against accusations of antisemitism by citing his support for Israel. Mr. Kirk defended Israel’s actions in Gaza. After his death, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel mourned him as “a lionhearted friend of Israel” who “stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization.” 

Advertisement

As some noted, there’s nothing wrong criticizing far-left Jewish donors who are subsidizing anti-American, pro-Hamas, and illiberal causes. Also, yes, get it together over there. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Please support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join TOWNHALL VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement