If That Figure Is Correct, That Is a Massive Infiltration of Hezbollah by...
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Did Not Just Say That About the Bondi Terror...
Some of Us May Die, But It's a Sacrifice Democrats Are Willing to...
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Tweaking the Naughty List: Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas...
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Why is Ilhan Omar's Husband's Investment Firm Removing Names From Their Website?
Tennessee Bookkeeper Who Stole $4.6 Million From Clients Sentenced to Prison
Make Vehicles Affordable Again
FBI Saves Taxpayers Billions in HQ Relocation
Gunman Dead, 3 Injured After Opening Fire on Idaho Sheriff's Office
Indicted Democrat Gets Dragged For Post Hiding $100k Ring Bought With Dirty Money
Tipsheet

The NYT Had to Post a Brutal Correction in Their Piece About Charlie Kirk

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Charlie Kirk was assassinated on Wednesday. He was 31. Kirk was struck in the neck by an assassin’s bullet while doing his Q&A session, a mainstay of his college campus activism, at Utah Valley University in Orem. Whether you liked him or despised him, his impact on American politics was pervasive. He broke down the blue walls around college campuses, breaking through with young men who are now decidedly Republican with their political views. He had a national constituency, who no doubt could’ve been formidable enough for a presidential run.

Advertisement

Now, he’s gone. But even after he’s passed, he’s still owning the institutional Left. Take The New York Times, which had to issue an embarrassing correction after calling Kirk an antisemite. The piece is a hit piece disguised as a quasi-listicle, and that topic was on the list (via NYT):

Mr. Kirk also accused Jewish philanthropists of fomenting anti-whiteness by supporting liberal antiracism causes like the Black Lives Matter movement.

“The philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country,” he said on his show in 2023. 

Not long after, he accused Jews of controlling “not just the colleges — it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it.” 

Allies of Mr. Kirk often sought to defend him against accusations of antisemitism by citing his support for Israel. Mr. Kirk defended Israel’s actions in Gaza. After his death, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel mourned him as “a lionhearted friend of Israel” who “stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization.” 

Advertisement

As some noted, there’s nothing wrong criticizing far-left Jewish donors who are subsidizing anti-American, pro-Hamas, and illiberal causes. Also, yes, get it together over there. 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Please support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join TOWNHALL VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement