Trump's National Security Council Is Being Overhauled. This Isn't New.
The Press Strains to Defend the Killing of Farmers, and Murdering Jewish Workers...
Beyond Appeasement: Why the Abraham Accords Must Expand Now
Colorado’s Trans Revolution is Worse Than You Think, As Governor Signs New Law
Don’t Rush the Future at the Expense of the Present
Congress’ Farm Bill Is the Opportunity We’re Looking for to Make America Healthy...
Wyoming Lawsuit Proves Democrats Want Illegal Aliens Voting, Not Deported
Now is the Time to Champion the Child Tax Credit
In Defunding Harvard, Trump Is Defending Free Thought
America’s Higher Education System Is Broken—and It's Costing Americans Everything
Defending Biological Reality in Federal Corrections Policy
Who is Ilhan Omar, and Does She Pose a Threat to America ?
Former Biden Diplomat: 'No Question' that 'Free Palestine' Slogan is a Call for...
Trump Builds $600M War Chest Ahead of Midterms, Largest of Any Other President...
Illegal Alien Nabbed After Voting in U.S. Elections, Stealing $400K in Benefits Using...
Tipsheet

That Alleged Judgeship Threat Seems to Have Come Back to Haunt a Jack Smith Staffer

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The arraignment for Trump aide Walt Nauta has been finally completed. Nauta, indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, pleaded not guilty to the obstruction of justice and false statements charges. Part of the classified document controversy earned Donald Trump his second indictment. Yet, Mike Davis, a former law clerk for Justice Neil Gorsuch, took to Twitter to voice his disgust regarding Nauta’s part in the legal drama. For starters, he feels that one of Mr. Smith’s staffers should face misconduct charges for threatening Nauta’s attorney.

Advertisement

That allegation was lobbed in June when Stanley Woodward met with federal prosecutors about Mr. Nauta’s predicament. They wanted the Trump valet to cooperate in their investigation with indictments looming. Smith’s counselor, Jay Bratt, was the one who allegedly brought up Woodward’s recent application for a judgeship and how that process might be greased if he played ball with the Feds.

Advertisement

As Rebecca wrote, this isn’t the first allegation of prosecutorial misconduct. Jack Smith might not have reviewed all the documents when deciding whether to indict Trump over mishandling classified materials. And now, with this third indictment against the former president over January 6, we’re putting Trump’s thoughts on trial. This overreach isn’t unusual for Mr. Smith, who is known for getting ahead of his skis on criminal matters.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement