Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Donald Trump Is a Great Man of History
So, What Is Normal?
JFK's Grandson Proves the Networks Still Bend the Knee to Kennedys
Trump Avoiding Repeating History in Iran
Men Are Back
The Supreme Court Should Protect Children From Predators
America Must Lead the Charge Against the Political Abuse of Religion
The Rules Were Never Meant for Them
The U.S. Needs Japan More Than Ever
For America’s 250th Birthday, Make the Senate Great Again
Tony Gonzales Suspends Campaign After Finally Admitting to the Affair He Denied for...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
Tipsheet

That Alleged Judgeship Threat Seems to Have Come Back to Haunt a Jack Smith Staffer

That Alleged Judgeship Threat Seems to Have Come Back to Haunt a Jack Smith Staffer
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

The arraignment for Trump aide Walt Nauta has been finally completed. Nauta, indicted by Special Counsel Jack Smith, pleaded not guilty to the obstruction of justice and false statements charges. Part of the classified document controversy earned Donald Trump his second indictment. Yet, Mike Davis, a former law clerk for Justice Neil Gorsuch, took to Twitter to voice his disgust regarding Nauta’s part in the legal drama. For starters, he feels that one of Mr. Smith’s staffers should face misconduct charges for threatening Nauta’s attorney.

Advertisement

That allegation was lobbed in June when Stanley Woodward met with federal prosecutors about Mr. Nauta’s predicament. They wanted the Trump valet to cooperate in their investigation with indictments looming. Smith’s counselor, Jay Bratt, was the one who allegedly brought up Woodward’s recent application for a judgeship and how that process might be greased if he played ball with the Feds.

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

As Rebecca wrote, this isn’t the first allegation of prosecutorial misconduct. Jack Smith might not have reviewed all the documents when deciding whether to indict Trump over mishandling classified materials. And now, with this third indictment against the former president over January 6, we’re putting Trump’s thoughts on trial. This overreach isn’t unusual for Mr. Smith, who is known for getting ahead of his skis on criminal matters.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement