Based on the Preliminary Info About the Trump Trial Jurors, the Rigged Narrative...
New NPR CEO's Take on the First Amendment Is What You'd Expect
There Are School Walkouts Happening Over Furries. Please Shoot Me Into the Sun.
Israel Strikes Back
Are Iran's Nine Lives Nearing an End?
Ich Bin Ein Uri Berliner
Hold Obama-Biden Foreign Policy Responsible for Iran's Unprecedented Attack on Israel
Reporter to KJP: Can We See the 'Cannibal' Tab in Your Book?
US Vetoes UN Resolution on Palestinian Membership
Did This Factor Into Gallagher's Early Resignation Decision?
Do Celebrities Have Deeper Liberal Thoughts?
The World Is Paying a Deadly Price for Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy
Maybe Larger Families Will Produce Better Leaders, as in the Early US
The Mainstream Media: American Democracy’s Greatest Threat
We've Found the Most Insane Transgender Criminal Case Yet
Tipsheet

Ted Cruz Rips Into SVB Bank: You Were More Focused on Woke Nonsense Than Sound Banking

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is opening a probe into the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.

The ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee wants to know, along with the Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission, what caused SVB to fail, making it the second-largest bank failure in American history. The tech industry has been taking a beating for nearly a year, with SVB heavily leveraged within that industry. It’s the place for tech startups to obtain loans. Yet, disturbing workplace practices have been revealed since the bank’s failure, namely that they didn’t have a risk assessment officer during the most volatile periods of the tech market. Cruz ripped into the bank, saying they seemed more concerned about ‘woke’ nonsense than sound banking. The Texas Republican also wants to know if the San Francisco FED doled preferential treatment to the bank.

Advertisement

In his letter to Silicon Valley Bank’s CEO, Tim Mayopoulos, Cruz wrote

SVB’s conduct raises concerns that it may have been more obsessed with promoting woke ESG practices than following sound banking practices.  There is evidence to support such concerns.  For example, SVB did not have a chief risk officer from April 2022 to January 2023—an eight month period during which “the VC market was spiraling.” Yet six months after the George Floyd protests began, it hired a chief diversity, equity and inclusion officer to “champion, promote and guide the company’s diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) strategies for its global workforce.” Moreover, in 2022, SVB changed the name of its Board’s “Governance Committee” to the “Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and expanded its oversight of the ESG strategy and program.” 

Advertisement

Cruz also wants to know why the SF Fed appeared asleep at the switch when they had all the resources and tools available that could have picked up on the dangers. Did the SF Fed conduct liquidity stress tests on SVB? We don’t know

“The SF Fed’s failure to address SVB’s obviously risky structure is frankly shocking. As you know, one of the central purposes of the Federal Reserve system is to promote the safety and soundness of financial institutions. It employs a team of over 400 economists, including dozens in the supervision and regulation division. The SF Fed, in particular, has a dedicated fintech team. And until March 10, 2023 SVB’s CEO served on the board of the SF Fed. The SF Fed had all of the resources and information necessary to properly supervise SVB, yet it spectacularly failed to do so.  

 “Instead of fulfilling its statutory mandate to supervise SVB, the SF Fed has been distracted with engaging in politically-charged research and advocacy on environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) and diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) topics, like global warming and racial justice.” 

Advertisement

Cruz sent letters to both SVB and SF Fed this week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement