Senators Demand Turkey Extradite Hamas Terrorists
Democrats Set the Standard for 'Unqualified'
Trump Drops a Flurry of Nominees to Head FDA, OMB, CDC, and HUD
We Might Have a Problem With Trump's Labor Secretary Nominee
Trump Makes His Pick for Treasury Secretary
Trump Clinches Another Win in Hush Money Case. How Some Libs Reacted.
The Proverbial Sacrificial Lamb
The Press Delivers a Fake News Trump Health Crisis, and the Bad Week...
One of Trump’s Biggest Allies Says He’s Never Getting Into Politics Again
Joy Reid Spews Hate Toward Trump Supporters Once Again
America's National Debt Just Hit a New Record
The View Forced to Read Three Legal Notes Within Minutes of One Another...
Watch This ABC Reporter Goes on Massive Tangent Blaming Trump for Laken Riley's...
Guess Who Joe Biden Just Awarded the Highest Civilian Honor To
Are Teens Leaning More Conservative or Liberal? Here’s What a New Poll Is...
Tipsheet

FiveThirtyEight: Herschel Walker's Abortion Fiasco Isn't a Scandal

AP Photo/Ben Gray

Georgia Democratic Senator Raphael Warnock’s re-election campaign is probably breathing a sigh of relief. The Peach State Democrat is leading in the polls against Republican Herschel Walker. However, Georgia is still chock full of Republican voters, it’s an off-year, the economy is bad, inflation is high, Joe Biden is unpopular—and Democrats are starting to lose their grip in some races. Like any politician, they all think they will lose in the next election, even those in safe districts. Warnock believes he dodged a bullet because Walker’s dirty laundry has been discovered. He allegedly paid for a girlfriend’s abortion, which the Daily Beast wrote about recently:

Advertisement

 A woman who asked not to be identified out of privacy concerns told The Daily Beast that after she and Walker conceived a child while they were dating in 2009 he urged her to get an abortion. The woman said she had the procedure and that Walker reimbursed her for it.

She supported these claims with a $575 receipt from the abortion clinic, a “get well” card from Walker, and a bank deposit receipt that included an image of a signed $700 personal check from Walker.

The woman said there was a $125 difference because she “ball-parked” the cost of an abortion after Googling the procedure and added on expenses such as travel and recovery costs.

Additionally, The Daily Beast independently corroborated details of the woman’s claims with a close friend she told at the time and who, according to the woman and the friend, took care of her in the days after the procedure.

 Walker’s son, Christian, also torched his dad on social media, calling him absent, among other things, though he also campaigned with him and procured a nice following from that activity.

Advertisement

The family drama with Walker was an incoming missile since he announced his Senate campaign. The abortion story is something else, but the social media flame war between Herschel and his son appears to be driving the despair factor regarding state Republicans, or at least that’s what Georgia native Erick Erickson is suggesting. Yet, for Democrats trying to weaponize the abortion allegations against Walker, they should know that it’s not a scandal. There was no crime if it happened, and FiveThirtyEight is not so high on this story being a decisive event:

The question is, how much will this controversy hurt Walker? Given the salaciousness of the story and the turmoil it has reportedly plunged his campaign into, it’s tempting to think it might torpedo his chances. But that’s hardly a guarantee.

It is true that scandals tangibly affect candidates’ chances of winning elections. I keep a database of scandals, and based on an analysis we did in 2018, we found that scandal-plagued incumbents did 9 percentage points worse in their next general election than they would otherwise be projected to do. That analysis included a variety of factors such as the candidate’s previous margin of victory, the partisan lean of their district, generic-ballot polling, congressional approval ratings and the incumbent’s congressional voting record. This finding led us to include whether or not a candidate faces a scandal as a variable in our midterm forecast.

But this new revelation about Walker, who has denied the allegation, hasn’t affected our forecast of the Georgia Senate race — at least not yet. That’s because, for one, it doesn’t meet our definition of a scandal. As our forecast defines it, a scandal is a credible accusation of objective criminal or ethical wrongdoing. While Walker’s decision to pay for an abortion may have been hypocritical, it wasn’t illegal. And if being hypocritical were enough to qualify as “scandal-tarred,” most politicians would be slapped with the label!

[…]

According to our polling average of the race, Warnock is currently polling 2 points ahead of Walker, so even if the controversy doesn’t hurt Walker, if it prevents him from gaining, that’s a problem for the Republican.

But on the other hand, there might not be many voters left to turn on Walker. Democrats have been airing ads for weeks reminding voters of Walker’s past scandals. And Georgia is also a highly inelastic state, meaning it doesn’t have a lot of swing voters. The National Republican Senatorial Committee has also said it will continue campaigning hard in Georgia. Many Republican and Republican-leaning voters in Georgia may feel that too much is at stake (i.e., control of the Senate) for this latest allegation to sway their vote.

Advertisement

That should throw some cold water on those who think politicians being exposed for hypocrisy is groundbreaking. The leak that needs to be shut down is the fight between the college football hall of famer and his son. Someone somewhere has to broker a sit-down and confiscate the kid’s phone until after Election Day.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement