Regime Media Can't Hide Their Desire for America to Be Defeated
Trump Dropped a Great One-Liner With Japan's PM...and It Wasn't the First Time
Japan's Prime Minister Saw Joe Biden's Pic on Trump's Wall of Fame. Her...
CBS News' Margaret Brennan Just Got Raked Over the Coals Again. Here's Why
Newsweek: 'Sinners' Would've Won More Oscars If Trump Weren't President
Report: IRGC General Ali Mohammad Naeini and Other High-Ranking Officials Killed in Airstr...
What Else Is She Hiding? After Social Media Scrutiny, Mamdani's Wife Deletes Her...
The Shadow War Against President Trump
They Want America Worst
Democrats Are Conditioning My Generation Not to Have Kids
Brian Stelter's Stilted Take on Trump Somehow Ending Democracy
Uncertainty Remains, After 20 Days of War With Iran
Iran's Most Powerful Weapon
Rejecting Gender Ideology for the Sake of Children
This Is No Longer Dysfunction — It Is Danger
Tipsheet

Another Legal War: Maryland Federal Judge Blocks Citizenship Question For 2020 Census

Another Legal War: Maryland Federal Judge Blocks Citizenship Question For 2020 Census
AP Photo/Paul Sancya

We all know the Trump administration wants to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The Left’s reaction is “as expected,” with allegations that’s it’s discriminatory, despite it being included in the survey in the 1950s. It’s become another battle in the courts. Obama-appointed judges have blocked the initiative, while another federal judge refused to nix it on privacy grounds. It’ll be decided in the Supreme Court, but until then—another federal judge has blocked the Trump initiative, citing a violation of administrative law (via WaPo):

Advertisement

A federal judge in Maryland ruled Friday against the government’s addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census, the third decision against the Trump administration on the issue.

Judge George J. Hazel, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in Greenbelt, found that the government violated administrative law when it decided to add the question last year. The ruling, like two earlier ones, will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court.

In his ruling, Hazel wrote, “The unreasonableness of Defendants’ addition of a citizenship question to the Census is underscored by the lack of any genuine need for the citizenship question, the woefully deficient process that led to it, the mysterious and potentially improper political considerations that motivated the decision and the clear pretext offered to the public.”

Hazel did not find enough evidence to support plaintiffs’ claims that the government intended to discriminate against immigrants, Latinos and Asian Americans by adding the question, or that adding the question was part of a conspiracy within the Trump administration to violate the constitutional rights of noncitizens and people of color.

The Commerce Department declined to comment, and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The executive order of immigration, rolling back the constitutionally questionable DACA program, enforcing our immigration laws etc. this is just another legal battle this White House has had to fight. It’s getting tiring.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement