What This Dem Rep Said About Trump Over the Weekend Is What Cost...
Idris Elba Argues Against 'Woke' James Bond
Did Talarico Just Flat-Out Lie About His Stance on This Issue?
Tim Walz Won't Like What's in This New House Committee Report
Karen Bass Just Responded to Nithya Raman's Surge—and It Sounded a Lot Like...
There Is Another Reason We Can't Let Democrats Win the Midterms
CNN's Harry Enten Says Election Fraud in LA Is 'the Dumbest Conspiracy Theory'...
Trump Officially Taps Acting AG Todd Blanche to Head Justice Department
Defense Rests Case After Shocking Day in Karmelo Anthony Trial
Trump Wants the Senate Parliamentarian Axed. Here's A Look Inside That Debate.
About That 'Bombshell' Endorsement James Talarico Got Today
Deranged Man Re-Enacts Charlie Kirk's Murder Outside of TPUSA Women's Summit Hosted by...
Obama-era Judge Shoots Down Key Trump H-1B Visa Policy
Unearthed Social Media Posts Show James Talarico Maintained Second Relationship With Legis...
New World Screwworm Cases Grow As Trump Admin, Abbott Vow to Fight Back
Tipsheet

Investigative Reporter On Trump Dossier Allegations: 'We Have Not Seen The Evidence To Support Them'

Investigative Reporter On Trump Dossier Allegations: 'We Have Not Seen The Evidence To Support Them'

Well, investigative reporter Michael Isikoff finally admits what many have already suspected: the Trump Dossier isn’t backed up with solid evidence and the most salacious and outrageous allegations are likely false. So, it’s mostly unverifiable. And yet, there are allegations that it was used to secure spy warrants against former Trump campaign officials, like Carter Page. Isikoff said that ex-MI6 spook Christopher Steele had some good leads, but the evidence is just not there (via USA Today):

Advertisement

A reporter, who was among the first to report on former British intelligence agent Michael Steele’s dossier alleging ties between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, said in an interview some of the dossier’s “more sensational allegations” are “likely false.” 

Michael Isikoff, the chief investigative correspondent for Yahoo News, said Saturday during an interview on conservative commentator John Ziegler's "Free Speech Broadcasting" podcast that "Steele was clearly onto something" in his probe into the campaign's Russian connection but evidence has not surfaced to support some of his specific assertions. 

Steele was correct to suspect "that there was a major Kremlin effort to interfere in our elections, that they were trying to help Trump's campaign, and that there were multiple contacts between various Russian figures close to the government and various people in the Trump campaign," Isikoff said. 

But he said when "you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them, and, in fact, there's good grounds to think that some of the more sensational allegations will never be proven and are likely false."

"It's a mixed record at best," he said.

We know Russia interfered in our election. Was it in collusion with the Trump campaign? There is zero evidence to support that claim, and as we enter year two of these allegations, the evidence is still lacking. It’s rapidly becoming a comical witch-hunt. Still, the investigation will go on because a) it’s political suicide for Trump to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is heading the probe; b) the Democrats are still obsessed with it; and c) even Republicans have questions about the investigation in which some institutions, like the FBI, haven’t been as forthcoming according to some lawmakers. 

Advertisement

So, even as the nothing burgers pile up with this inquiry, as long as Trump is president, the liberal media remains operational, and the Democratic Party remains functional—the Russian investigation will continue. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement