Chuck Schumer Is Toast
Kash Patel Posts Update on Investigation into Trump Would-Be Assassin Thomas Crooks
Why Dems Had to Delete This Tweet About Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
This Hunter Biden Interview Was Totally Out of Control
Top Republican Went Scorched Earth on Dems Over Failed Schumer Shutdown Circus
Hemp Industry Gearing Up for Battle After Spending Bill Ban
Democrats Are Why Our Healthcare Costs Keep Rising
Here's What the Creators of Satirical 'Anne Frank' Musical Don't Want You to...
Federal Appeals Court Halts DOT Rules Limiting Immigrant Commerical License Access
Before It’s Too Late: The West Must Prepare for Iran’s Next Crisis
COP-30 insanity vs Global Tide of Climate and Energy Reality
The Shutdown Isn’t the Crisis. Congressional Spending Is.
Congress Squandered $838 Million Subsidizing Intercity Buses in Fiscal Year 2025
Don't Drop the Call on America's First Responders
Newsom’s Veto of Hormone Therapy Bill Signals Fiscal Caution, Not Ideological Shift
Tipsheet

Resistance Bloc: Here Are The Democrats Voting No On Virtually All Of Trump's Nominees

For the Democratic base, stopping President Trump is a top priority. They need to stop his nominees, his agenda—everything. That’s easy to say, harder to do with their party in the minority—and highly qualified nominees aren’t going to be voted down or blocked. Yet, there is a handful of Resistance—that’s what they call themselves, these left-wingers—lawmakers in the Senate. They’re a dedicated group of anti-Trump Democrats who have virtually opposed every one of President Trump’s nominees. And it’s no shocker that they’re the most liberal of the bunch (via Axios):

Advertisement

A handful of Senate Democrats are committed to opposing President Trump’s executive branch nominations at every turn — and the group bears an uncanny resemblance to the rumored 2020 frontrunners.

Between the lines: Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Cory Booker have nothing to lose by voting against Trump's nominations — and a lot to gain with the Democratic voters they'll need if they decide to run for the White House.

The winner: The list is topped by Gillibrand, who voted to confirm David Shulkin (an Obama holdover) and Nikki Haley, but no others for prominent leadership roles. She was the lone vote against Jim Mattis as Defense Secretary.

Yeah, you guessed it—it’s pretty much the 2020 presidential class: Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Kamala Harris (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

The only one that could pull off a potential 2020 win is Sanders, but time will tell. He’ll be pushing 80 by the time the next election rolls around. Gillibrand and Booker are unknown outside of the Catskills and Northern New Jersey respectively. Harris is trying to increase her public profile, as is Booker, though she isn’t well likedamong the Bernie-ites of the Democratic Party. All these folks having going for them is that they’re the anti-Trump candidates. That won’t be enough to win. John Kerry was the anti-Bush and lost. Romney was the anti-Obama and lost. The Democratic Party has no economic message, not a real one. They’re for free college, raising the minimum the wage, universal health care (though they’ve eaten each other on how to get there), and empathizing with MS-13.  Yeah, a murderous group of thugs that is MS-13, who stabbed a man over 100 times, removed his heart, and beheaded him, are not animals, folks. They’re still humans. That’s the hill the Left wants to die on?     

Advertisement

So be it. We’ll win. And if this is the top of the Democratic pile for 2020, the cream of the crop, I’m not that worried.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos