Biden Had a Jeb Bush Moment at West Point
Democrats Are Getting Desperate
The Left Killed George Floyd
The UN Should Memorialize the Iranian President’s Victims, Not Raisi Himself
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 219: What the Bible Says About Stars
Punishment That Fits the Crime
Six Reasons to Vote in Elections
UNRWA Is the Poster Child for Why America Should Leave the U.N.
Our Institutions Are Burning Themselves Down
Saluting America's Champions
UnitedHealth's Harms Reach Far Beyond Recent Cyberattack
A University System Just Repealed Its DEI Policy
Chuck Schumer Admits Democrats’ 'Ultimate Goal,' And It's Not Good
Xi Jinping Asks American Tourists to 'Save' China's Failing Economy
Fast Food Is Now Considered a 'Luxury' Item, Thanks to Bidenflation

Why Chuck Todd is Right, and Why McCain Can Win ...

Yesterday on "Meet The Press," Tom Brokaw sought to "school" Chuck Todd concerning political predictions.  Here's how "Viva Chuck Todd" scores the exchange

The Chuck did what he's paid to do: prognosticate based on careful examination of current trends and data. Specifically, Obama not winning Montana and North Dakota. This set Tom off to quickly chide The Chuck in one might say, a condescending way: "Now be careful what you say at this stage about what he's going to win and what he's not going to win." The Chuck politely deferred to grandpa Tom's scolding and got back in the flow.

But, of course, Chuck Todd is correct.  That's because he rocks, and Brokaw doesn't (there is no website called "Viva Brokaw!"). 

In all seriousness, Todd's point underscores the primary reason John McCain still has a chance to win the election;  National popularity matters much, much less in a "winner-take-all" electoral system than it would in a national election.

Consider this:  In 2004, Bush got 64 percent of the vote in North Dakota.  Clearly, John McCain won't do that well -- but he will most assuredly win the state (as Chuck Todd correctly predicts). 

Here's why Todd can essentially guarantee it:  Let's suppose that Obama's popularity is so impressive and overwhelming that it garners him 10 more points in North Dakota than John Kerry got just four years ago.  That would be impressive, but he would still lose the state by a landslide.  And McCain would still get all three electoral votes.  You see, it really doesn't matter if Obama gets 49 percent of the North Dakota vote, or 35 percent of the North Dakota vote -- he still loses the state.  That extra 14 points of popularity means nothing.

This isn't the only example of how Obama's chances are being over-sold.  Today, cable TV news was "abuzz" about Obama's chances to win in the South (this is supposed to send shivers down my spine and show that Obama is building this amazing juggernaut).  The truth is that Obama has no chance in the real south.  The only real chance Obama has to pick-up a "southern" state is in Virginia -- and that has more to do with the changing demographics in the state than it does with Obama's popularity.   Virginia is a purple state, and has been for a while, now. 

Obama does have a chance in VA, but McCain can make up for it by picking off a Kerry state.  This, of course, is not impossible.  He has a chance to win New Hampshire (where McCain rules), Minnesota (home of Pawlenty and the GOP Convention), Pennsylvania (home of "bitter gun-clingers") and Michigan (Romney country), just to name a few ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos