The Defense Department Lost Track of Millions Sent to Chinese Labs
Bill Maher and Cuomo Admit Something We've All Known About the Trump Hush...
Does Everyone Hate Caitlin Clark Because She's a Straight White 'B**tch'?
Why The Associated Press' Article About the TX Girl Murdered by Illegal Aliens...
Why the Latest GOP Attempt to Hold Garland Accountable Over Biden Tapes Could...
The AP Shields Illegal Killers
Get Ready for a 'Once-in-a-Lifetime' Thermonuclear Space Explosion That Will Be Visible Fr...
What This Big-Time Democrat Donor Had to Say About Trump Is Stunning
Disney Exec. Admits It Discriminates Against White Male Applicants
'Squad' Member Jamaal Bowman Accused of Plagiarizing As He Runs to Secure the...
Virginia Dem Eugene Vindman's Campaign Struggles, While Fmr. Green Beret Emerges As GOP...
This Democrat Mayor Insists the U.S. 'Needs' Illegal Immigrants
The New York Times Has Bad News on Biden's Support Among Another Key...
Three Columbia University Deans Placed On Leave Over Disparaging Antisemitism Texts
30 Tons of Fentanyl Has Crossed U.S. Border Under Joe Biden's Presidency
Tipsheet

Problems, Solutions & Conservatism

Ezra Klein argues that both major political parties are equipped to solve different types of problems.  As such, the immediate success of a political party is directly linked to the types of problems that need to be solved at a given time:
Advertisement
"It's possible an Obama presidency will be so effective at communicating and conducting its foreign policy that few will ever want to trust Republicans with the military again. But broadly speaking, the set of problems that each party has relative ownership over has remained constant for the better part of a century, and that means there are times when the party seems relevant, and times when it doesn't. My hunch is these will be out years for the Republicans, but not because they're waiting for new ideas. Rather, it'll be because they're waiting for the reemergence of old problems."

This is an interesting theory, inasmuch as it essentially argues that both political parties are needed -- at different times -- to correct the other party (and to solve the full-spectrum of "problems" a nation faces.)  Moreover, Klein seems to graciously concede that conservatives are, in fact, better equipped to solve some problems (though not the ones Americans currently care about).

This also makes me think of Newt Gingrich, who went so far as to name his organization, "American Solutions."  This essay, I think, could have just as easily have been written by Gingrich, which is interesting, in and of itself.

... While there's certainly an element of truth in Klein's essay, I'm not completely sold.  I would argue this has more to do with voter's perceptions and elections than about actual problem solving and leadership.  But it's interesting, nonetheless. 

By the way, Andrew Sullivan does a good job explaining how the very premise betray's conservatism:

Advertisement
"For conservatism to copy liberalism by always seeking 'solutions' to problems and convincing 'the right coalitions' of people to look to government for the satisfaction of their needs would be a mistake in my view." 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement