Happy Belated Birthday, America!

Mary Katharine Ham
Posted: Jul 05, 2007 11:28 AM
For those of you wondering, the fact that I did not write a 4th of July post yesterday does not mean I'm a commie. It does mean that I'm officially techno-cursed, and had to wait until everyone got back from vacation so they could fix my techno-issues, so I could post again.

So, I wrote a post yesterday, but I couldn't post it. So, here it is today.

First of all, my friend Patrick, serving in Iraq right now, just became Capt. Patrick O. Francescon of the U.S. Marine Corps this weekend, and this seems like an appropriate place to celebrate it:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Congrats, Patrick, take care, and ooh rah!

And, speaking of young American heroes, July 4th seems an appropriate time to talk about Mr. TJ:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

My favorite, and the best-looking of all the Founding Fathers, if you ask me. He was all of 33 when he was chosen to write the document that would sever ties with England and be quoted by schoolchildren forevermore (or, until the ACLU finds a way to ban that, too.) He was appointed by a committee of no less than John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Robert R. Livingston, and Roger Sherman. He worked on several drafts from June 11 to June 28, at which point the document was presented to the rest of the committee and to the Congress.

But why Jefferson when so many pillars of American society undoubtedly stood by with quills in hand?

Let's ask John Adams:

"You inquire why so young a man as Mr. Jefferson was placed at the head of the committee for preparing a Declaration of Independence? I answer: It was the Frankfort advice, to place Virginia at the head of everything. Mr. Richard Henry Lee might be gone to Virginia, to his sick family, for aught I know, but that was not the reason of Mr. Jefferson's appointment. There were three committees appointed at the same time, one for the Declaration of Independence, another for preparing articles of confederation, and another for preparing a treaty to be proposed to France. Mr. Lee was chosen for the Committee of Confederation, and it was not thought convenient that the same person should be upon both. Mr. Jefferson came into Congress in June, 1775, and brought with him a reputation for literature, science, and a happy talent of composition.

Writings of his were handed about, remarkable for the peculiar felicity of expression. Though a silent member in Congress, he was so prompt, frank, explicit, and decisive upon committees and in conversation - not even Samuel Adams was more so - that he soon seized upon my heart; and upon this occasion I gave him my vote, and did all in my power to procure the votes of others. I think he had one more vote than any other, and that placed him at the head of the committee. I had the next highest number, and that placed me the second. The committee met, discussed the subject, and then appointed Mr. Jefferson and me to make the draft, I suppose because we were the two first on the list.

The subcommittee met. Jefferson proposed to me to make the draft. I said, 'I will not,' 'You should do it.' 'Oh! no.' 'Why will you not? You ought to do it.' 'I will not.' 'Why?' 'Reasons enough.' 'What can be your reasons?' 'Reason first, you are a Virginian, and a Virginian ought to appear at the head of this business. Reason second, I am obnoxious, suspected, and unpopular. You are very much otherwise. Reason third, you can write ten times better than I can.' 'Well,' said Jefferson, 'if you are decided, I will do as well as I can.' 'Very well. When you have drawn it up, we will have a meeting.'

A meeting we accordingly had, and conned the paper over. I was delighted with its high tone and the flights of oratory with which it abounded, especially that concerning Negro slavery, which, though I knew his Southern brethren would never suffer to pass in Congress, I certainly never would oppose. There were other expressions which I would not have inserted if I had drawn it up, particularly that which called the King tyrant. I thought this too personal, for I never believed George to be a tyrant in disposition and in nature; I always believed him to be deceived by his courtiers on both sides of the Atlantic, and in his official capacity, only, cruel. I thought the expression too passionate, and too much like scolding, for so grave and solemn a document; but as Franklin and Sherman were to inspect it afterwards, I thought it would not become me to strike it out. I consented to report it, and do not now remember that I made or suggested a single alteration.

We reported it to the committee of five. It was read, and I do not remember that Franklin or Sherman criticized anything. We were all in haste. Congress was impatient, and the instrument was reported, as I believe, in Jefferson's handwriting, as he first drew it. Congress cut off about a quarter of it, as I expected they would; but they obliterated some of the best of it, and left all that was exceptionable, if anything in it was. I have long wondered that the original draft had not been published. I suppose the reason is the vehement philippic against Negro slavery.

As you justly observe, there is not an idea in it but what had been hackneyed in Congress for two years before. The substance of it is contained in the declaration of rights and the violation of those rights in the Journals of Congress in 1774. Indeed, the essence of it is contained in a pamphlet, voted and printed by the town of Boston, before the first Congress met, composed by James Otis, as I suppose, in one of his lucid intervals, and pruned and polished by Samuel Adams."

--John Adams, The Works of John Adams, vol II

God Bless America and Jefferson's "felicity of expression."