You're Probably Going to Laugh at the Latest Update Regarding the Somali Daycare...
CBS Unveils a ‘New’ Evening News After Losing America’s Trust
Seattle's New Mayor Joins the Left's Push to Classify Somali Fraud Investigations As...
‘Seize the Streets’: Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Issues Bold Call as Iran...
Guess Who Hakeem Jeffries Blamed Once Again for the End of Obamacare Subsidies
Independent Journalist Cam Higby Uncovered More Somali Daycare Fraud in Washington
'Then It Is War:' Elon Musk Responds to Somali TikToker's Death Threat
Mamdani's Disastrous Block Party Is a Glimpse Into NYC's Socialist Future
Newsom Delays Crackdown on Illegal Immigrant CDLs As Duffy's Jan. 5 Deadline Approaches
Minnesota Fraud is Just the Tip of the Iceberg
Zohran Mamdani Begins Sweeping Housing Overhaul Hours After Being Sworn in
Federal Judge Orders Prison Sentences in Celebrity Romance Scam
Walz Unveils Paid Leave Program Amid Fallout From Massive Minnesota Fraud Scandals
This Fast Food Chain Is Launching a New Product to Celebrate America's 250th...
Why Paying Off Debt Matters More Than Ever in 2026
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Decision for Major Abortion Case Accidentally Posted Online

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

The United States Supreme Court is poised to allow doctors in Idaho to perform abortions during certain medical emergencies, according to Bloomberg. The outlet claimed that a draft opinion of the upcoming decision was accidentally posted online on Wednesday. The document was taken down soon after.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court offered a response, acknowledging that the opinion in Moyle v. U.S., Idaho v. U.S. was “briefly” uploaded to its website. 

"The Court's Publications Unit inadvertently and briefly uploaded a document to the Court's website," a spokesperson said. "The Court's opinion in these cases will be issued in due course."

According to Bloomberg, this ruling from the high court would reinstate a lower court order that allowed hospitals in the state to perform “emergency abortions” for the mother’s health. The outlet noted that the posted version of the decision indicated that the judges dismissed appeals from Idaho and pro-life leaders in the state. 

According to CBS News, the copy of the opinion showed a 6-3 split, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch in dissent.

"Apparently, the court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents," Alito reportedly wrote.

Reportedly, Justice Elena Kagan authored a concurring opinion, stating the decision "will prevent Idaho from enforcing its abortion ban when the termination of a pregnancy is needed to prevent serious harms to a woman's health,” adding that allowing the injunction to go back into effect “will give Idaho women access to all the needed medical treatments that EMTALA guarantees."

Advertisement

Related:

ABORTION

The case decided whether a federal law requiring hospitals that participate in Medicare to provide “necessary stabilizing treatment,” including an abortion, in an emergency trumps an Idaho law that bans most abortions. In addition, the state law includes criminal penalties of up to five years in prison for anyone who performs one or assists an abortion. There are limited exceptions for rape and life of the mother. 

After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Idaho was one of many states that enacted laws protecting the unborn, as Townhall covered. The Biden administration brought forward the legal challenge, claiming that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act trumps the state law.

A lower court agreed with the Biden administration and blocked the Idaho law. When the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, it lifted the injunction.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement