GOP Voters Are RINO Hunting
Let's See Who Will Defend the Latest Fiasco Involving Graham Platner
Ilhan Omar's Response When Questioned About Minnesota Fraud Scandal Tells Us All We...
America: The Real Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Florida Teacher Hangs Black Doll by Neck in Classroom as a 'Display'
Teachers' Union Leaders Plan Violent Protests While Schoolchildren Can't Read
A Book About the Threats to the Truth by AI Contains False Content...
Jamie Raskin Continues to Lie About President Trump's Charlottesville Remarks
The U.S. Announces Indictment of Former Cuban Leader Raúl Castro
Did CNN Really Just Get Karen Bass to Admit She's a Failure?
California Bill Takes Mandatory Training in Idiotic Direction
US to Withdraw 5,000 Troops From Europe
James Talarico Is Your Typical DEI Democrat, He Hates White People
Jeff Bezos Just Destroyed the Left's 'Tax the Rich' Line
Trump Comes Out in Support of Spencer Pratt and Reveals the One Thing...
Tipsheet

Judge Rules Ex-College Soccer Player Allegedly Benched for Refusing to Kneel Can Proceed With Lawsuit

Judge Rules Ex-College Soccer Player Allegedly Benched for Refusing to Kneel Can Proceed With Lawsuit
AP Photo/Markus Schreiber

A former soccer player for Virginia Tech can continue a lawsuit against her former coach who allegedly benched her for refusing to kneel during a pregame social justice demonstration during the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020, a judge ruled this month. 

Advertisement

Kiersten Hening was a midfielder/defender for Virginia Tech’s women’s soccer team from 2018 to 2020 and filed a lawsuit against her coach, Charles “Chuggar” Adair in 2021. On Dec. 2, District Court Judge Thomas Cullen ruled that the lawsuit can move forward, as Adair may have violated Hening’s First Amendment rights (via Fox News):

Hening alleged that Adair was not a fan of her political views and that she often differed from her teammates on social justice issues during the height of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020.

Hening further explained in the lawsuit that while she "supports social justice and believes that black lives matter," she "does not support BLM the organization," citing its "tactics and core tenets of its mission statement, including defunding the police."

After Hening declined to kneel during a reading of a "unity statement" before a game against UVA on Sept. 12, 2020, she said Adair "verbally attacked her" at halftime, claiming she was "b--tching and moaning" while jabbing a finger in her face.

The coach continued to berate Hening until he benched her and ultimately made things so intolerable that she felt compelled to quit the team, according to the suit.

Advertisement

Related:

FIRST AMENDMENT

Judge Cullen reportedly noted that Hening’s time on the field dropped significantly after the incident in Sept. 2020 and she was removed from the starting lineup.

“Ultimately, Adair may convince a jury that this coaching decision was based solely on Hening’s poor play during the UVA game, but the court, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Hening, cannot reach that conclusion as a matter of law,” Cullen said in his ruling.

“While the US Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit may not have addressed the novel factual circumstances presented here — i.e. a college coach allegedly retaliating against a player for refusing to kneel with her coaches and teammates in support of perceived unity and social justice — the core Constitutional principle is both clearly established and fundamental to a free society, and especially to an institute of higher education.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement