This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
House Republicans Want to Know Why Ilhan Omar's Income Jumped by 140 Times...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
'Brass-Knuckled Hypocrisy:' Even the Washington Post Is Slamming Virginia Democrats' Redis...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Here Is the Real Reason Bad Bunny Is Anti-American
We Didn't Think Progressives Could Make LA Any Worse, but They Can
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

U.S. Beauty Pageant Has Constitutional Right to Exclude Transgender Women, Court Rules

Kevork Djansezian

Beauty pageant organization Miss United States of America LLC cannot be forced to allow biological males who identify as transgender women to compete, an federal appeals court ruled Wednesday. 

Advertisement

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that allowing transgender people to compete in the pageant would interfere with its ability to show “the ideal vision of American womanhood,” according to a report from Reuters.

The lawsuit was brought forth by Anita Green, a transgender rights activist, who reportedly claimed that the pageant’s policy of only allowing “natural born women” violates an anti-discrimination law based on gender identity in Oregon.

The judges said that the Oregon law, if applied to the pageant, would violate the organization’s free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution. The court agreed with the pageant that it “expresses its views on womanhood by determining who can compete," Reuters noted in its report.

"It is commonly understood that beauty pageants are generally designed to express the 'ideal vision of American womanhood,'" Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke wrote in the opinion. VanDyke is an appointee of former President Donald Trump.

VanDyke was joined by Circuit Judge Carlos Bea, who is an appointee for former President George W. Bush. Judge Susan Graber wrote the dissenting opinion. She was appointed by former President Bill Clinton.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER WOKE

Late last month, a Thai business tycoon who is a biological male that identifies as a woman purchased the Miss Universe pageant organization for $20 million, as Townhall covered. Chakrapong “Anne” Chakrajutathib’s company issued a statement announcing the change and said that it is the first time the Miss Universe organization “will be owned by a woman.”

In 2021, a transgender person named Kataluna Enriquez made headlines after being crowned Miss Nevada USA, the first transgender “woman” to do so. Enriquez defeated 21 other biological women for the spot, according to NPR, and was allowed to compete in the upcoming Miss USA pageant that year. Once Miss USA is crowned, they go on to compete in Miss Universe. Enriquez did not end up winning the following competition and complained about facing “discrimination” at beauty pageants because they were not assigned a female roommate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement