Let Your Rabid Leftist Friends And Family Go
Outgoing Biden Admin Exposed for Special Interest Corruption
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 243: What the New Testament Says About Fearing...
The Forever-Tarnished Legacy of Barack Obama
Avoiding Self-Inflicted Trade and Economic Wounds
Giving Thanks Is Good For You
The Hidden Pro-Life Message You Missed at Miss Universe
The Border's Broken Vetting System: Why We Can't Wait to Fix It
Can We Take Back the English Language Now?
Trump's Strategy On Iran Could End Middle East Wars
Trump Names His New Agriculture Secretary
Bombshell Report Reveals Disturbing Truths About the Biden-Harris Parole Pipeline
Gen. Milley Makes Stunning Admission About Incoming Trump Administration
ICE Sends Hochul Grim Warning After Arresting Wanted Illegal Immigrant
Sickening: An Illegal Alien Allegedly Raped a 14-Year-Old Girl in Colorado
Tipsheet

GOP Senate Candidate Says She Supports State Law Allowing Abortion Up to Fetal Viability

AP Photo/Rebecca Santana

The Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Washington said in an interview on Sunday that she supports a law in the state allowing abortion up to fetal viability.

Advertisement

Tiffany Smiley made the remark in an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Dana Bash. In the interview, Bash pressed Smiley on her views on a state law, enacted in 1991, that allows abortion until the fetus is deemed viable, which is generally around 23-24 weeks.

“I do,” Smiley said in support of the law. “I respect the voters of Washington state. They long decided where they stand on the issue.”

Washington’s state law on abortion says “the state may not deny or interfere with a pregnant individual's right to choose to have an abortion prior to viability of the fetus, or to protect the pregnant individual's life or health.”

Smiley added that she does not support a federal ban on abortion. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade that a national abortion ban is “possible.”

"I look forward to ensuring that women have access to health care, contraception, that in a time of crisis here in Washington state, that they have every resource that they need to make the best choice," Smiley told Bash.

In one of Smiley’s campaign ads, she claims she’s “pro-life” but does not support a federal ban on the procedure. 

Advertisement
In another ad, she repeated her stance.

“As an OB-GYN triage nurse, I have seen the heartbreak and the tears. I am pro-life, but to be clear, I will oppose a federal abortion ban,” she said.


Smiley is challenging Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, who is pro-abortion. When SCOTUS overturned Roe, she said in a statement that “Republicans dragged this country backwards by half a century” and “ripped away our rights.”

“Every American needs to understand that this is a real crisis that will affect millions of people across this country,” she added. “But we aren’t going to stand idly by while they rip away abortion rights, or go after birth control next.”

"My opponent Patty Murray has spent millions trying to paint me as an extremist," Smiley wrote in a recent tweet. "What’s really extreme is @MurrayCampaign’s position of taxpayer-funded abortions up until the point of birth!"

In the Supreme Court’s majority opinion, the justices wrote that the U.S. Constitution does not protect the right to abortion and that Roe and Casey were on a “collision course” the days they were decided.

“The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,” the opinion stated.

Advertisement

“Like the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, Roe was also egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided. Casey perpetuated its errors, calling both sides of the national controversy to resolve their debate, but in doing so, Casey necessarily declared a winning side. Those on the losing side—those who sought to advance the State’s interest in fetal life—could no longer seek to persuade their elected representatives to adopt policies consistent with their views. The Court short-circuited the democratic process by closing it to the large number of Americans who disagreed with Roe.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement