Former Rolling Stone Contributing Editor Does Not Hold Back in Eviscerating Taylor Lorenz
Is This Trump's Best Line From the White House Easter Egg Roll?
The Left's Obsession With Clipping Pete Hegseth Is Bordering on Psychotic
Trump Won’t Get Tricked Into Sacrificing Pete Hegseth to the Democrats
The Questions Democrats Will Not Ask
Rogue Commanders, The Enemy Within
An Easter Weekend Filled With Manufactured Scandals From the Floppy-eared Media
When a Wrong Narrative Hides the Truth
Trump’s DHS and DOJ Are Going After MS-13, Not Moms at School Board...
The World Needs People Day More Than Earth Day
The Savaging of the Climate Politico-Legal-Media Complex
The Moral Bankruptcy of a 'Day of Rage' and the Palestinian Legacy of...
MSNBC Hits Back At Gavin Newsom For Calling Deportation Of MS-13 Member A...
Tim Walz’s Daughter Claims Trump Would Have Deported Jesus, Lumping Him with MS-13
Jamie Raskin Vows Revenge On Foreign Leaders Who Work With Trump
Tipsheet

McConnell Says a National Abortion Ban Is 'Possible'

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in an interview late last week that a national ban on abortion is possible if the United States Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade

Advertisement

McConnell made the remarks in an interview with USA Today days after a draft opinion from the Supreme Court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was leaked and published by Politico. In the opinion, the Justices voted to overturn Roe

“If the leaked opinion became the final opinion, legislative bodies — not only at the state level but at the federal level — certainly could legislate in that area,” McConnell said in the interview when he was asked if a national abortion ban is “worthy of debate.”

“And, if this were the final decision, that was the point, that it should be resolved one way or another in the legislative process. So yeah, it’s possible,” he added.

McConnell later added that’s “clear” where Republicans stand on the issue of abortion. If the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe, the issue of abortion would be legislated by each state. Several states have “trigger laws” in place to automatically restrict abortion if Roe is overturned.

The draft opinion, which was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, The draft opinion's conclusion reads, in part:

Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.

Advertisement

In the opinion, Alito refers to Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey as “egregiously wrong,” the same language Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch used in her Dobbs amicus brief filed last summer.

Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.

Fitch's amicus brief filed last July reads, in part: 

Roe and Casey are egregiously wrong. The conclusion that abortion is a constitutional right has no basis in text, structure, history, or tradition…So the question becomes whether this Court should overrule those decisions. It should.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement