We’re in a Slow-Rolling Civil War, President Trump Needs to Recognize It
The Democrats' Hamas Problem
Bogus Study Says the U.S. Is in the 'Midst of Genocidal Process.' Guess...
Rep. Tim Burchett Just Shared an Alarming Update on Where Minnesota Fraud Money...
They Can Hate Israel All They Want
The Consequences of Leftist Lawlessness
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 302: What the Bible Says About Pain
While Democrats Promote Hoaxes, Republicans Must Stand for Truth
Sons of Liberty, Sons of Legacy: Forming the Men Who Will Shape America’s...
Banning the Muslim Brotherhood: A Good Start, Part 2
The Problem of Clergy Sowing Discord
Former DC Cop Sentenced to 27 Years for Trafficking Minors
Venezuelan National Charged in Alleged $1 Billion Crypto Money Laundering Scheme
You'll Never Guess Who This CNN Host Thinks the 'Actual Victims' of the...
Indiana Credit Union CEO Sentenced to Federal Prison in $285K Bank Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Google Sued by Several State Attorneys General Over ‘Deceptive’ Location Tracking

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

Attorneys general representing Washington D.C., Indiana, Texas, and Washington filed lawsuits against Google on Monday over the platform’s “deceptive” location tracking of users, including those who’ve made efforts to block the platform from doing so.

Advertisement

As reported by The New York Times, the attorneys general claim that Google duped consumers using “dark patterns” to gain access to their location data. Users of Android phones, users of tools like Google Maps, and users of Google’s search engine continued to be tracked and had their information collected despite having privacy settings in place to prevent their data from being collected.

Washington D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine (D) led the complaints after a three-year investigation. The Times noted that Racine said investigators had found that since 2014, Google made “misleading” and “conflicting” claims to users regarding their privacy protections while using the company’s products.

“The District of Columbia lawsuit alleged that even after users changed the settings in their account or device to stop location tracking, Google collected and stored that information through Google services, Wi-Fi data and marketing partners. The search giant also misled and pressured users to enable more location tracking, for example by claiming products would not function properly if the location services setting was disabled when in fact it was not needed to use the app, according to the suit.

‘Google falsely led consumers to believe that changing their account and device settings would allow customers to protect their privacy and control what personal data the company could access,’ Mr. Racine said in a statement. ‘The truth is that contrary to Google’s representations it continues to systematically surveil customers and profit from customer data.’

Google said that the allegations brought by the attorneys general were false and that it had put in place many changes to its privacy policies to help users protect their location data.

‘The attorneys general are bringing a case based on inaccurate claims and outdated assertions about our settings,’ said Jose Castaneda, a spokesman for Google. ‘We have always built privacy features into our products and provided robust controls for location data. We will vigorously defend ourselves and set the record straight.’”

Advertisement

Related:

BIG TECH GOOGLE

In the Times’ report, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, a Republican, said “Google has prioritized profits over people” and that the platform “has prioritized financial earnings over following the law.” The attorneys general are aiming to fine Google and to stop its practice of collecting location information of users who’ve opted out.

“Google uses tricks to continuously seek to track a user’s location, but the time of trickery for profits is over.” Racine wrote on Twitter. “We sued Google today to hold them accountable for illegally using ‘dark patterns’ to deceive users and invade their privacy.”

Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that “the attorneys general are bringing a case based on inaccurate claims and outdated assertions about our settings.”

“We have always built privacy features into our products and provided robust controls for location data. We will vigorously defend ourselves and set the record straight,” he added.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement