Mayhem Strikes California Christmas Parade
Hunter Biden Indicted on Tax Evasion Charges
How Were the Universities Lost?
Facebook Groomers, CNN Travel Writers Do Not Want You to Travel, and the...
This Chanukah, Let's Vow to Defeat Our New Oppressors: Higher Education
Biden Lies Preposterously About Meeting His Son Hunter's Clients
For True Evil, Look Not to Israel or America but to Communism
A Short History of Joe's Long Record of Lying About Biden Inc.
My Take On the Horrific UNLV Shooting
6 Extremely Stubborn Facts About the Israeli-Palestinian Crisis
You Say You Want an Intifada, Part II
Grass Roots Liberty Force Emerges in Virginia
So Far Past the Rubicon
This Is Who Melania Trump Is Reportedly Pushing for Her Husband's VP, and...
Hunter Biden Hit With Nine New Indictments

SCOTUS May Let Kentucky’s Attorney General Defend Abortion Law Struck Down By Lower Courts

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard arguments regarding a procedural matter centered on the authorization of Kentucky’s Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a Republican, to defend a state abortion restriction that lower federal courts struck down as “unconstitutional.”


Today’s events derived from the case EMW Women’s Surgical Center P.S.C. v. Meier, which arose in 2018 when Kentucky passed a law, House Bill 454, banning an abortion procedure method known as “dilation and evacuation,” from the second trimester of pregnancy onward. This gruesome method of abortion is common in the second trimester of pregnancy. At the time, Gov. Matt Bevin, a Republican, was in office to sign the bill into law.

As soon as the law took effect, a Kentucky-based abortion clinic, EMW Women’s Surgical Center and two of its doctors challenged the law, claiming that it placed an unconstitutional undue burden on abortion access. 

Following a trial, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled H.B. 454 as unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement. The state appealed the ruling to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the District Court’s decision. When Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear assumed office, he decided to drop the case. Cameron attempted to enter the case to revive H.B. 454, which the Sixth Circuit denied, claiming that his motion was untimely. Now, Cameron has asked SCOTUS to authorize his attempt to intervene in the case.


According to the Associated Press, Justice Stephen Breyer said “[w]hy can’t he just come in and defend the law?” In the report, the AP notes that the word “abortion” was mentioned infrequently in the 70 minutes of arguments. 

“If Cameron is allowed to take part, he could ask the full appeals court to reconsider the panel decision and allow the law to take effect. If he loses there, Cameron could appeal to the Supreme Court,” the report reads.

On Dec 1., SCOTUS will hear arguments for a separate case relating to abortion, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which could overturn precedents set by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos