Paxton > Cornyn
This Fox News Host Easily Tore Through This Dem Rep's Talking Points About...
If You Think Democrats Care About You, Then You’re an Idiot
The Press Admits It Only Trusts Iran; Loyola U. Newspaper Apologizes for Insulting...
The Political Instant Replay
From the 'Only in Israel' Desk
Exclusive 'Interview': Gavin Newsom on His Possible Presidential Launch
How Will Congress Choose to Handle the Iran Bill?
Better Rude and Truthful Than Smooth and Deceitful
Is the American Empire Doomed to Crumble?
Nearly 150 Servicemembers’ Cars Auctioned Off Illegally, DOJ Lawsuit Alleges
Daycare Director Allegedly Stole $2.75M, Spent It on Wrestling Events, Luxury Goods, and...
Double Standard? Dems Backed Expulsion Before, Now Quiet on Alleged $5M FEMA Fraud.
Loyola University Paper Apologizes for Calling Murder Suspect an 'Illegal Immigrant'
New GOP Governor Poll Shows Tight Michigan Primary Race Between James and Johnson
Tipsheet

The Trump Admin Isn't Taking That Appeals Court Ruling on Tariffs Sitting Down

The Trump Admin Isn't Taking That Appeals Court Ruling on Tariffs Sitting Down
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to quickly determine whether the president has the authority to impose sweeping tariffs, which were invalidated by a lower court.

Advertisement

In a 7-4 decision last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down most of President Trump’s tariffs as illegal.

“The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution,” the court said. “Tariffs are a core Congressional power.”

The decision did not take effect immediately, however, with the ruling paused until Oct. 14, giving the administration time to bring the case before the Supreme Court.

In its appeal, the Trump administration argued striking the tariffs down would jeopardize “both already negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations” with other countries. "The stakes in this case could not be higher."

Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the justices to decide by Sept. 10 whether to review the case and to schedule oral argument for the first week of November — just one month after the court’s new term begins. If the justices accept the case, it would be the first to reach the court in Mr. Trump’s second term that directly tests the legality of one of the administration’s signature initiatives rather than addressing the president’s actions on a temporary emergency basis.

Since taking office, Mr. Trump has relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 as a central part of his efforts to force companies to invest in the United States.

Without the emergency powers, the president and his advisers have warned of major damage to the nation’s economy, military power and diplomatic relations, particularly if the government were forced to pay back some of the billions of dollars it has already collected in tariffs.

The lower court’s “erroneous decision has disrupted highly impactful, sensitive, ongoing diplomatic trade negotiations, and cast a pall of legal uncertainty over the president’s efforts to protect our country by preventing an unprecedented economic and foreign-policy crisis,” the solicitor general told the justices in his request for highly expedited review. (NYT)

Advertisement

Editor's Note: President Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age" as Democrats try desperately to stop it.  

Help us continue to report on President Trump's successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement