Lindsey Graham Was a Patriot
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Claimed She Got a Black Voter Group's Endorsement. Here's the...
About That ICE-Involved Shooting in Maine...
Look at This CNN Host's Face When Trump Dropped This Line During a...
Footage of Ro Khanna's 'Violent' West Bank Detention Released. Notice Anything Wrong?
The Sara Rodriguez Campaign Just Imploded
New NRCC Ad Sounds the Alarm on the Radical Socialist Takeover of the...
Grandfather Recovering After Scary Encounter With a Yellowstone Bison
June Inflation Report Crushes ‘Experts’ Predictions, Biggest Win in Over Five Years
While Abdul El-Sayed Pushes for Socialized Medicine, His Psychiatrist Wife Won't Accept An...
Adam Kinzinger's Post on Lindsey Graham's Passing Is As Despicable As You'd Expect
Lefties Fleeing Red States Are Draining Seattle's 'Transgender' Nonprofits
NYC Is Going to Lose Billions Thanks to Mamdani's Tax-the-Rich Scheme
The Iranian Assassination Plot Against President Trump Just Shows How Much Our Adversaries...
President Trump Officially Informed Congress That the War Against Iran Has Resumed
Tipsheet

The Trump Admin Isn't Taking That Appeals Court Ruling on Tariffs Sitting Down

The Trump Admin Isn't Taking That Appeals Court Ruling on Tariffs Sitting Down
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The Trump administration on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to quickly determine whether the president has the authority to impose sweeping tariffs, which were invalidated by a lower court.

Advertisement

In a 7-4 decision last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down most of President Trump’s tariffs as illegal.

“The core Congressional power to impose taxes such as tariffs is vested exclusively in the legislative branch by the Constitution,” the court said. “Tariffs are a core Congressional power.”

The decision did not take effect immediately, however, with the ruling paused until Oct. 14, giving the administration time to bring the case before the Supreme Court.

In its appeal, the Trump administration argued striking the tariffs down would jeopardize “both already negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations” with other countries. "The stakes in this case could not be higher."

Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the justices to decide by Sept. 10 whether to review the case and to schedule oral argument for the first week of November — just one month after the court’s new term begins. If the justices accept the case, it would be the first to reach the court in Mr. Trump’s second term that directly tests the legality of one of the administration’s signature initiatives rather than addressing the president’s actions on a temporary emergency basis.

Since taking office, Mr. Trump has relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 as a central part of his efforts to force companies to invest in the United States.

Without the emergency powers, the president and his advisers have warned of major damage to the nation’s economy, military power and diplomatic relations, particularly if the government were forced to pay back some of the billions of dollars it has already collected in tariffs.

The lower court’s “erroneous decision has disrupted highly impactful, sensitive, ongoing diplomatic trade negotiations, and cast a pall of legal uncertainty over the president’s efforts to protect our country by preventing an unprecedented economic and foreign-policy crisis,” the solicitor general told the justices in his request for highly expedited review. (NYT)

Advertisement

Editor's Note: President Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age" as Democrats try desperately to stop it.  

Help us continue to report on President Trump's successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement