If That Figure Is Correct, That Is a Massive Infiltration of Hezbollah by...
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Did Not Just Say That About the Bondi Terror...
Some of Us May Die, But It's a Sacrifice Democrats Are Willing to...
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Tweaking the Naughty List: Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas...
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Why is Ilhan Omar's Husband's Investment Firm Removing Names From Their Website?
Tennessee Bookkeeper Who Stole $4.6 Million From Clients Sentenced to Prison
Make Vehicles Affordable Again
FBI Saves Taxpayers Billions in HQ Relocation
Gunman Dead, 3 Injured After Opening Fire on Idaho Sheriff's Office
Indicted Democrat Gets Dragged For Post Hiding $100k Ring Bought With Dirty Money
Tipsheet
Premium

Judge Accused of Aiding Illegal Immigrant Gets Some Bad News From Federal Magistrate Judge This Week

AP Photo/Devi Shastri

Remember Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan? The one arrested in April and charged with two federal counts after she allegedly helped an illegal immigrant evade federal immigration authorities? She got some bad news this week. 

In May, she filed a motion to have the charges against her dismissed, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge. But on July 7, U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph recommended the motion to dismiss be denied.

“Whether Dugan violated these statutes as the government accuses, or whether she was merely performing her judicial duties as Dugan asserts, these are questions for a jury that cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss,” Joseph wrote in a 37-page report and recommendation. “A judge’s actions, even when done in her official capacity, does not bar criminal prosecution if the actions were done in violation of the criminal law."

While that's a setback for Dugan, things could turn in her favor as the matter will now go to U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, a highly political and outspoken Clinton appointee, as GWU law professor Jonathan Turley points out. 

"A judge is expected to come to a case like this one without the burden of his own baggage. Judge Adelman is carrying more baggage than Amtrak in Wisconsin," he said. 

[T]he public has a right to expect a fair trial with a judge who will not be swayed by his own political viewpoints," Turley continued. "Dugan already had the advantage of a trial before a jury taken from one of the most liberal districts in the country. She will now have a judge who was himself sanctioned for political statements and reversed for ignoring controlling precedent." 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement