CNN Host Highlights What Maine Dems Are Bracing for Regarding Graham Platner
Meet the Pair of Socialists Who Recruited Graham Platner. You Can See How...
You Won't Believe What This Former Platner Staffer Said About His Campaign
Alaska's Democratic 'Decoy' Senate Candidate's Son's Suspicious Ties Just Got Exposed
This Intruder Broke Into an Armed Homeowner's Residence and Immediately Regretted It
This GOP Holdout Is Now on Board With the SAVE America Act
Embedded Evil
Qintel Puts Pittsburgh on the Map for Cyber Intelligence
Roy Cooper Is Blaming Washington DC for Rising Energy Costs. His Own Record...
The SPLC Is Being Grilled on Capitol Hill—Watch Jim Jordan Accuse Them of...
Gavin Newsom Has a Solution to California's Election Process. And It's Exactly What...
JD Vance Calls Out California's Election System As Public Scrutiny Mounts
Seattle Schools Are Hiding Children's 'Gender Identity' Changes From Parents, and It's Leg...
Trump Vows Response to Iran Shooting Down American Helicopter
Sickening: African Migrant Brutally Stabs, Attempts to Decapitate Man in Belfast
Tipsheet
Premium

Judge Accused of Aiding Illegal Immigrant Gets Some Bad News From Federal Magistrate Judge This Week

Judge Accused of Aiding Illegal Immigrant Gets Some Bad News From Federal Magistrate Judge This Week
AP Photo/Devi Shastri

Remember Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan? The one arrested in April and charged with two federal counts after she allegedly helped an illegal immigrant evade federal immigration authorities? She got some bad news this week. 

In May, she filed a motion to have the charges against her dismissed, arguing she was acting in her official capacity as a judge. But on July 7, U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph recommended the motion to dismiss be denied.

“Whether Dugan violated these statutes as the government accuses, or whether she was merely performing her judicial duties as Dugan asserts, these are questions for a jury that cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss,” Joseph wrote in a 37-page report and recommendation. “A judge’s actions, even when done in her official capacity, does not bar criminal prosecution if the actions were done in violation of the criminal law."

While that's a setback for Dugan, things could turn in her favor as the matter will now go to U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, a highly political and outspoken Clinton appointee, as GWU law professor Jonathan Turley points out. 

"A judge is expected to come to a case like this one without the burden of his own baggage. Judge Adelman is carrying more baggage than Amtrak in Wisconsin," he said. 

[T]he public has a right to expect a fair trial with a judge who will not be swayed by his own political viewpoints," Turley continued. "Dugan already had the advantage of a trial before a jury taken from one of the most liberal districts in the country. She will now have a judge who was himself sanctioned for political statements and reversed for ignoring controlling precedent." 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement