Bystanders Intervene as Naked Man Tries to Kidnap 7-Year-Old at Portland Park
Trump Administration Cracks Down on Schools Shielding Pedophile Teachers
James Talarico Laments Illegal Alien Who Tried to Run Over ICE Agents, but...
Why Is Gavin Newsom's Office Stonewalling a Media Investigation Into His Free Diaper...
There's Been Another ICE-Involved Shooting in Maine, and Here's What We Know So...
Prison for Thee, but Not for Me
California Democrats Just Made Grocery Bills Even More Expensive
'Now We're in Congress:' Rashida Tlaib Lays Out the Socialist Agenda in Rage-Filled...
Amnesty International Makes a Fool of Itself After Listing These Organizations As 'Hate...
Here's What Activists Claim Is Driving Child Marriage in Parts of the World
‘Jurassic Park’ Actor Sam Neill Dies at 78
Sen. Lindsey Graham May Have Been Known For His Hawkishness. But He Holds...
The US Struck Dozens of Targets in Iran As the Fight Over the...
We Now Know Who Will Likely Replace Lindsey Graham
Trump Just Unveiled a Huge Change for the Strait of Hormuz
Tipsheet

Bondi Praised for Making 'One of the Best Decisions Ever'

Bondi Praised for Making 'One of the Best Decisions Ever'
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Attorney General Pam Bondi notified the American Bar Association that the Trump administration will no longer grant the organization access to non-public information about judicial nominees.  

Advertisement

"For several decades, the American Bar Association has received special treatment and enjoyed special access to judicial nominees," Bondi said in the letter to ABA President William Bay.  "In some administrations, the ABA received notice of nominees before a nomination was announced to the public. Some administrations would even decide whether to nominate an individual based on a rating assigned by the ABA." 

Bondi then called out the ABA for its liberal leanings.

“Unfortunately, the ABA no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees’ qualifications, and its ratings invariably and demonstrably favor nominees put forth by Democratic administrations,” Bondi continued. 

“Accordingly, while the ABA is free to comment on judicial nominations along with other activist organizations, there is no justification for treating the ABA differently from such other activist organizations and the Department of Justice will not do so," she added. "Specifically, the Office of Legal Policy will no longer direct nominees to provide waivers allowing the ABA access to non-public information, including bar records. Nominees will also not respond to questionnaires prepared by the ABA and will not sit for interviews with the ABA."

Advertisement

The ABA website explains how it rates judicial nominees:

The Standing Committee rates each nominee "Well Qualified," "Qualified" or "Not Qualified." Unanimous committee ratings appear as a single rating. In other situations, the rating from the majority or substantial majority (2/3 or more of those voting) of the Committee is recorded first, followed by the rating or ratings of a minority of the Committee. The majority rating is the rating of the committee.

Ratings of judicial nominees are posted by Congressional session and are available for those nominated during the 101st Congress to the present. 

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) praised Bondi for making the decision to curtail the ABA's role in vetting judicial nominees: 


 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement