I Like JD Vance So Much That I Want Him Primaried Hard
Here's the Trump Administration's Latest Salvo Against the Federal Reserve
Wait, How Much of the US Budget Is Stolen Every Year? Scott Bessent...
Ilhan Omar Spewed a WHOPPER About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis on Face...
What This MS Now Guest Said About ICE and Firearms Was Peak Stupidity
With Iran on Fire, Trump Says They're Looking Into 'Very Strong Options' on...
Democrats Are Making a New Martyr
The Embodiment of Lawfare
Ecofeminist Once Declared Steak a Tool of White Supremacy
Can Republicans Defy History in 2026?
Watching History Unfold
Conflicting Thoughts on Venezuela From a Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul Noninterventionist
Will President Trump Push for Real Change at CNN?
Iran Does Not Need a Crown — It Needs a Republic
Litigation Funding Helps Level the Legal Playing Field
Tipsheet

Have San Francisco Voters Finally Had Enough of the Lawlessness?

AP Photo/Jeff Chiu

The political pendulum is beginning to swing the other way in San Francisco as voters, increasingly frustrated by lawlessness in the city, overwhelmingly passed a pair of ballot measures that require drug screening for welfare recipients and increased police surveillance.

Advertisement

The results are a win for Mayor London Breed, who supported the measures as she prepares for a reelection battle in November. Not long ago, such a position would have been "political suicide" in the progressive city, Politico notes, but residents have grown tired of open drug use, needles littering the sidewalks, homeless encampments along their commutes, retail theft, closed businesses, and crime, polling shows. 

Proposition E, which authorizes police to use surveillance equipment — cameras, drones, and even facial-recognition technology — without prior permission from an oversight body, passed with 59,818 votes, or 59.9 percent. The proposition will also loosen restrictions on police chases and require that officers spend less time on paperwork and administrative duties.

Proposition F, which mandates that anyone receiving public-assistance benefits be screened for  a substance-abuse disorder, passed with 63,295 votes, or 63 percent.

As part of the proposition, public-assistance recipients found to be drug-dependent could be offered treatment. If it is made “available at no cost, the recipient will be required to participate to continue receiving” public benefits, according to the proposition. (National Review)

Advertisement

Related:

CRIME SAN FRANCISCO

“We want San Francisco to be exactly what the people who live here want to see,” Breed told supporters. “And that is a safe, affordable place to call home.”

Tuesday's results have some San Francisco papers questioning the city's identity, with The San Francisco Standard wondering if it's "still a liberal bastion."

Results from Tuesday, and an even more consequential election in November, are raising the question of whether San Francisco’s vaunted reputation as a liberal bastion—home to the Summer of Love and the LGBTQ+ rights movement—is being hollowed out like an Ozempic patient. The answer, as always in this city, lies in the eyes of the beholder.

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement