Virginia Dems Reject Insane Idea to Nuke State Supreme Court to Push Gerrymandered...
Scott Jennings Went 'DEFCON-1' on the Dems' Redistricting Insanity on CNN
Hey, Katie Porter, I'm Not Sure You Can Say That About Tom Steyer
Here's the Tweet That Highlights Why Dems Are So Angry About the VA...
The Democrats' 2026 Midterm Hopes Got Punched in the Gut, But It's Not...
Why a PA Supreme Court Justice Just Resigned From the Democratic Party
We May Have Some Trouble in South Carolina Over Redistricting
John Fetterman Bashes BlueAnon Conspiracy Theories About Trump Assassinations
We Will Not Allow Hantavirus to Become COVID 2.0
AG Jay Jones Is Appealing Virginia Supreme Court's Redistricting Ruling. There's Just One...
Hakeem Jeffries Says 'Total Judicial Reform' Is on the Table If Dems Regain...
Is This NYT Story Why Antisemitic Mobs Terrorized Jewish Neighborhoods Last Night?
Antisemitic Mobs Invaded Jewish Neighborhoods in NYC Again Last Night
Exclusive: Mike Rogers Launches Major Six Figure Manufacturing-Focused Ad Buy in Michigan...
United Pilot Has Been Grounded Over '8647' Facebook Post
Tipsheet

Judge Hands Down Sentence to Former Trump Adviser Peter Navarro for Contempt of Congress

Judge Hands Down Sentence to Former Trump Adviser Peter Navarro for Contempt of Congress

Former Trump adviser Peter Navarro was handed a four-month prison sentence Thursday for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena.

Additionally, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ordered Navarro to pay a $9,500 fine, considerably less than the $200,000 fine the Justice Department sought.

Advertisement

Navarro, a trade adviser to the former president, was convicted in September of two counts of contempt of Congress for not producing documents related to the investigation and dodging his deposition. 

“Let’s be clear, Dr. Navarro: You are not a victim here,” Mehta said during a court hearing. “This is not a political prosecution [and] these are circumstances of your own making.”

He continued: "Your obligation as an American is to cooperate with Congress, to provide them with the information they were seeking."

Mehta said he made Congress' job more difficult and that's what the case is about. "It wasn't a kangaroo court," he argued. "The public could see that."

The judge said that, given Navarro’s background, he should have known that he had a duty to comply with the congressional subpoena. Navarro had tried to cite executive privilege, a legal doctrine that allows some conversations between a president and advisers to remain confidential.

The judge said that, even if executive privilege had been properly invoked, Navarro was still required to provide some information to the committee.

“You were more than happy to talk to the press about what you did… but not go up to the Hill to talk to Congress,” the judge said.

“The words ‘executive privilege’ are not some magical incantation,” the judge said. “It’s not a Get Out of Jail Free card.”

The Justice Department had suggested a six-month sentence for Navarro, saying he had thumbed his nose at congressional authority as if he were above the law.

Another Trump ally, Steve Bannon, was previously sentenced to four months in prison for similar conduct. A judge allowed Bannon to remain free while he pursues an appeal of his underlying conviction, which is still pending. (WSJ)

Advertisement

Related:

JANUARY 6

According to Axios, Navarro immediately appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeals.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos