Trump Reveals What North Korea's Kim Jong Un Called Joe Biden. It's Hilariously...
CNN's Scott Jennings Asked This Dem Rep a Simple Question. He Couldn't Answer...
It Seems Maine's Democratic Primary for the US Senate Is Over
Why Some Dems Are Seething Over David Hogg's PAC
Dems Got Served a Piping Hot Cup of Shut the Hell Up on...
It Didn't Take Long for Abigail Spanberger to Collapse in Virginia
Look at This SNL Star's Face When His Fellow Castmate Shared This Story...
President Trump Said the Iranian Regime Ends Tonight
Grab Some Tissues and Watch the Artemis Crew's Touching Tribute to Commander Reid...
The U.S. Has Carried Out Strikes on Kharg Island
Democrat Darling Hasan Piker Has a Plan for Capitalists. Guess What It Is.
Court Rejects Disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan's Request to Toss Her Guilty Verdict
Wisdom From America’s Founders: Government Isn’t Evil, But…
Pope Leo's Flawed War Doctrine
Iraq Cannot Afford to Repeat the Maliki Catastrophe
Tipsheet

Second Amendment Win: Federal Judge Blocks Illinois Ban on Some Semi-Automatic Rifles, Magazines

Second Amendment Win: Federal Judge Blocks Illinois Ban on Some Semi-Automatic Rifles, Magazines
AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, File

A federal judge in Illinois has temporarily blocked enforcement of a ban on some semi-automatic rifles and large capacity magazines, ruling that there is a “reasonable likelihood” that multiple plaintiffs who have sued will be successful in their argument that the law violates their Second Amendment rights. 

Advertisement

The law, known as the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA), was passed after the mass shooting in Highland Park last year, where a gunman opened fire at an Independence Day parade, killing seven and injuring dozens of others. 

“Can the senseless crimes of a relative few be so despicable to justify the infringement of the constitutional rights of law-abiding individuals in hopes that such crimes will then abate or, at least, not be as horrific? More specifically, can PICA be harmonized with the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and with Bruen? That is the issue before this Court. The simple answer at this stage in the proceedings is ‘likely no,’” U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn said in the ruling. "The Supreme Court in Bruen and Heller held that citizens have a constitutional right to own and possess firearms and may use them for self-defense. PICA seems to be written in spite of the clear directives in Bruen and Heller, not in conformity with them."

McGlynn also pointed to other means available for addressing gun violence. 

"There is a wide array of civil and criminal laws that permit the commitment and prosecution of those who use or may use firearms to commit crimes," he said. "Law enforcement and prosecutors should take their obligations to enforce these laws seriously. Families and the public at large should report concerning behavior. Judges should exercise their prudent judgment in committing individuals that pose a threat to the public and imposing sentences that punish, not just lightly inconvenience, those guilty of firearm-related crimes."

Advertisement

The decision handed down Friday came days after another federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois rejected a request to block the law.

Responding to the ruling, Attorney General Kwame Raoul's office said it will file an appeal.  “We…remain committed to defending the constitutionality of the Protect Illinois Communities Act."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement