Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About...
Why This Huffington Post Reporter's Good Friday Tweet Was Quite Embarrassing
The Iran Ceasefire Talks Have Imploded
Did You See That March Jobs Report?
Trump Reportedly Will Issue New Order That Will Pay Civilian Staffers for ICE/Border...
Ex-Biden Staffer Charged With Murder. Here's What Happened.
Chuck Schumer Is In Worse Trouble With His Party Than We Thought
Here's What I Want From the Next Attorney General
Colorado Springs Man Sentenced for Hate Crime Hoax That Probably Flipped the City's...
Plainclothes Miracle
Check Out This Kid's Hilarious Response to CNN When He's Asked Why He's...
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
Nine-Year Bid-Rigging Plot Inflated US Air Force Contracts by $37 Million
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
Tipsheet

NYT Declares 'It May Be in No One’s Interest to Reveal More' About Nord Stream Sabotage

NYT Declares 'It May Be in No One’s Interest to Reveal More' About Nord Stream Sabotage
AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File

The New York Times declared Friday that “it may be in no one’s interest to reveal more” about who is responsible for the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines.

The latest report comes weeks after the paper covered “new intelligence” suggesting that a pro-Ukrainian group pulled off the covert operation. That claim was met with widespread ridicule, given that Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell exposé a month earlier alleging the Biden administration was behind the attack. According to Hersh, U.S. and German intelligence agencies gave the Times that “false cover story to counter the report.” 

Advertisement

Now, though, the Times appears to be done asking questions.

Naming a culprit could set off unintended consequences.

Claiming Russia was behind the attack would mean it had successfully sabotaged major critical infrastructure in Western Europe’s backyard, and could spark demands for a response.

Blaming Ukrainian operatives could stoke internal debate in Europe about support for their eastern neighbor.

And naming a Western nation or operatives could trigger deep mistrust when the West is struggling to maintain a united front.

“Is there any interest from the authorities to come out and say who did this? There are strategic reasons for not revealing who did it,” said Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a Danish naval commander and military expert at the University of Copenhagen. “As long as they don’t come out with anything substantial, then we are left in the dark on all this — as it should be.” (NYT)


Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement