Trump Finished His Call With Putin. Here is the Result.
Sanctuary Fail: ICE Nabs Criminal Aliens in Massachusetts
The DOJ Is Going to Review Biden's Pardons
A Medical Doctor Dropped a Bombshell on MSNBC About Biden's Cancer Diagnosis
Trust the Process
Supreme Court Gives Trump a Major Victory on Immigration
Scott Adams Announces Terminal Cancer Diagnosis, Expects to Be 'Checking Out' This Summer
Scott Jennings Warns GOP Lawmakers: Oppose Trump’s Bill, and You’ll Pay for It
New Gun Control Bill Likely Violates More Than Just the Second Amendment
Israeli Minister: Trump a 'Miracle' for Israel, Broader Middle East
The CBS News Chief Is Leaving
Republicans Have Taken the Lead in Voter Registration in This Florida County
Karoline Leavitt Just Torched the Media Over Lies About Qatari Jet
Schumer Ruthlessly Ratioed for Post on Brooklyn Bridge
No, We Aren't Just Going to 'Get Over' the Biden Incapacity and Gaslighting...
Tipsheet

NYT Declares 'It May Be in No One’s Interest to Reveal More' About Nord Stream Sabotage

AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File

The New York Times declared Friday that “it may be in no one’s interest to reveal more” about who is responsible for the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines.

The latest report comes weeks after the paper covered “new intelligence” suggesting that a pro-Ukrainian group pulled off the covert operation. That claim was met with widespread ridicule, given that Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell exposé a month earlier alleging the Biden administration was behind the attack. According to Hersh, U.S. and German intelligence agencies gave the Times that “false cover story to counter the report.” 

Advertisement

Now, though, the Times appears to be done asking questions.

Naming a culprit could set off unintended consequences.

Claiming Russia was behind the attack would mean it had successfully sabotaged major critical infrastructure in Western Europe’s backyard, and could spark demands for a response.

Blaming Ukrainian operatives could stoke internal debate in Europe about support for their eastern neighbor.

And naming a Western nation or operatives could trigger deep mistrust when the West is struggling to maintain a united front.

“Is there any interest from the authorities to come out and say who did this? There are strategic reasons for not revealing who did it,” said Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a Danish naval commander and military expert at the University of Copenhagen. “As long as they don’t come out with anything substantial, then we are left in the dark on all this — as it should be.” (NYT)


Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement