Wait, CNN Was Partying With the Iranians in the UK?
Why a Member of Jasmine Crockett's Security Team Was Just Shot and Killed...
Wait, Did This CNN Guest Just Blame the US for the 9/11 Attacks?
This Quote From Gov. Stitt Is NOT Good News Regarding Who He'd Pick...
What These Two Girls Are Laughing About Is Beyond Chilling
A Dissent for the Ages
Progressive Crackpots Vs. Environmental Wackos
The Congressman the Left Hates the Most Just Announced a Major Immigration Reform...
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
It’s Time to Build America With U.S.-Made Materials
DEI Is Dead. Corporate America Just Hasn’t Admitted It Yet.
Affordability Is Not a Slogan. Democrats Treat It Like One.
From Panic to Therapy: Cycle of Faux Climate Fear
President Donald J. Trump Can Index Capital Gains With Pen
Tipsheet

SJW Democrat Shows Hypocrisy Over Objection to Affordable Housing Development Near Mansion

SJW Democrat Shows Hypocrisy Over Objection to Affordable Housing Development Near Mansion

Golden State Warriors point guard Steph Curry and his wife, Ayesha, are objecting to the development of multi-family housing next to their $30 million California mansion.

Advertisement

The couple, which the New York Post points out is “routinely vocal on matters of social justice,” wrote officials in Atherton, the most affluent community in the country, about their concerns.

“We hesitate to add to the ‘not in our backyard’ (literally) rhetoric, but we wanted to send a note before today’s meeting,” they said last month. “Safety and privacy for us and our kids continues to be our top priority and one of the biggest reasons we chose to live in Atherton.”

Home to tech moguls, athletes and international business titans, Atherton officials will reluctantly submit a plan to the state this week outlining their efforts to increase housing density.

The parcel in question — which abuts the Curry residence — is set to be rezoned in order to accommodate several multi-family units sought by the owner.

“With the density being proposed for 23 Oakwood, there are major concerns in terms of both privacy and safety with three-story townhomes looming directly behind us,” their email read.

The couple noted that the development would not add to low-income housing to the area, only increase density. (NY Post)

If the plan moves forward, the Currys want the town to build “considerably taller fencing and landscaping to block sight lines onto our family’s property.”

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement