Well, the NYT Caved and Omitted This Serious Allegation Against Graham Platner
Platner Accuser Blasts New York Times for Watering Down Her Story to Help...
ACLJ Joins Client – Family of School Shooting Survivor – in Condemning Roblox...
Looks Like Democrats Don't 'Believe All Women' Anymore
Obama-Appointed Judge Faces Impeachment for Having Loud Sexual Encounters in Her Chambers
Scott Pelley Wasn't a Journalist. He Was a Democratic Operative.
Lefty Bitterly Admits President Trump's Reflecting Pool Looks Good
Despite the 'Wrong and Toxic' Allegations Against Graham Platner, He's Still Ro Khanna's...
Johnathan Turley Weighs In on CA's Election Chaos
Rep. Ro Khanna to Attend Rally Alongside Graham Platner Despite Bombshell NYT Report
US Attorney Launches Sweeping Election Fraud Probe in California
Prediction Markets Are Flashing Warning Signs for California Primary Races
Judge Orders Trump Admin to Resume Asylum and Immigration Processing
An 'Arctic Frost'-Style Investigation Could Be Prevented With This Bill
Maryland Man Pleads Guilty in $4 Million Tax and COVID Unemployment Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet
Premium

Civil Rights Group Sounds Off on How SF Police Department Wants to Use Robots

Civil Rights Group Sounds Off on How SF Police Department Wants to Use Robots
John bazemore

In 2016, amid the deadliest attack on law enforcement in the U.S. since 9/11, Dallas police made the controversial decision to send a bomb-equipped robot into the parking garage where the assailant, who had killed five officers, was holed up. After a lengthy negotiation with the suspect broke down and gunfire started being exchanged, officers decided to deploy the robot to kill the man. “We saw no other option but to use our bomb robot,” Dallas Police Chief David Brown said about the then-unprecedented decision. 

But now, interest in lethal robots is picking up. 

The San Francisco Police Department made waves recently over a draft policy that would allow law enforcement officers to use lethal force against suspects in “extreme circumstances.” 

Contrary to a measure that was defeated in Oakland, which would have outfitted robots with shotgun rounds, the SFPD clarified they’re considering the use of explosive devices. 

"The SFPD does not own or operate robots outfitted with lethal force options and the Department has no plans to outfit robots with any type of firearm," spokesperson Allison Maxie said in a statement. "As an intermediate force option, robots could potentially be equipped with explosive charges to breach fortified structures containing violent, armed, or dangerous subjects or used to contact, incapacitate, or disorient violent, armed, or dangerous suspect who pose a risk of loss of life to law enforcement or other first responders by use of any other method, approach, or contact." 

Maxie continued: "While an explosive charge may be considered an intermediate force option, it could potentially cause injury or be lethal. Robots equipped in this manner would only be used in extreme circumstances to save or prevent further loss of innocent lives."

Civil rights groups are sounding off against the proposed policy. 

“We are living in a dystopian future, where we debate whether the police may use robots to execute citizens without a trial, jury, or judge,” said Tifanei Moyer of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, reports Mission Local. 

The policy is going up for a vote by the full San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday. 

Update: The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved the policy, 8-3, allowing robots to be equipped with explosive devices to be used in "extreme circumstances to save or prevent further loss of innocent lives."

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement