How Do They Come Up With So Many Stupid Democrats?
Of Course, There's a Biden Connection to DC's Fecal Fiasco
Here's Something the Media Is Trying to Keep Quiet About Goldman Sachs' Top...
The Company a President Keeps
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 307: Interview With a Distinguished Professor About Her...
As Israel Goes, So Goes America
How Soft Persecution and Socialist Indoctrination Are Erasing America's Soul
The Quiet Power Grab Undermining Healthcare and Accountability
Abortion Lovers: Stop Making Women Your Pawns
Will Trump Emissions Rule Change Make New Vehicles Affordable Again?
Happy Birthday to the Venerable 1911
Big Hat, No Cattle: 5 Indicted in $220 Million Nationwide Cattle Fraud Scheme
'We Send Billions to Dead People': Kennedy Stuns in NewsNation Interview
New Nick Shirley Video Interviews People, Some Children, Living on Skid Row in...
Here's the Latest on the Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Tipsheet

How One Defiant Virginia Superintendent Plans to Punish Children in Compliance With Gov. Youngkin's Mask Order

How One Defiant Virginia Superintendent Plans to Punish Children in Compliance With Gov. Youngkin's Mask Order
AP Photo/Steve Helber

Shortly after Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin issued an executive order giving parents the right to decide whether to send their children to school in masks, several school districts immediately declared they would continue requiring face coverings regardless.

Advertisement

Now, one superintendent is going so far as to direct school administrators to suspend students who won’t wear a mask.

On Friday afternoon, January 21, […] Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent went rogue and issued a 34-page “Principal Briefing” PowerPoint at a meeting with school administrators, ordering them to suspend students from school for a “Dress Code” violation if they don’t wear masks in school, according to a copy of the briefing received by Parents Defending Education. […]

- In slide No. 12, headlined, “R2109 Regarding Mask Refusal,” the school district instructed administrators: “Continue to follow existing regulations and practices. Any student who refuses to wear a face covering while indoors on school property or during FCPS-provided transportation, and who is not otherwise exempt will be precluded access to face-to-face instructional programming until they comply with the requirements of this regulation.”

- Regarding “Intentional Removal / Refusal to Wear Face Covering,” he said: “Intentional removal of or refusal to wear a face covering during the times face coverings are required by all students will be treated as a violation of the Regulation 2613 (Student Dress Code). This includes indoors on school property and transportation.

- This will result in an “SRR Violation of BSO7 (Dress Code),” and noted: “BSO3 (Refusal to comply with staff requests…) may be used as a secondary infraction code to document refusal despite redirection from staff.” The point has a big “NEW!” graphic beside it.

- The “Response” will be swift with a “1 day OSS,” which means “Out of School Suspension” for students who don’t wear masks. (Asra Nomani Substack)

Advertisement

Youngkin warned last week that these defiant school districts ought to prepare themselves "because we granted parents the option to decide whether they want their child to wear a mask or not, and we're going to protect that right."

He added, "every resource within the governor's authority" will be considered to ensure "parents' rights are protected."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement