I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
DHS Slaps Down Baltimore Sun Over Fake News About Recent ICE Arrest
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
This Is What Marco Rubio Said When Asked About North Korea
Baltimore Mayor Tried to Stop Watchdog Investigation – Now He's Facing a Lawsuit
CA Judge Steps in Allowing 20,000 Illegal Alien Truck Drivers to Remain on...
The State of the Union – A Win Is a Win
Democrats Smell Blood in Texas, but Republicans Are Ready
The Media Once Scolded Us for Using a Certain Label They Now Love
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Vice President Vance Destroyed Tony Evers for Refusing to Help Clean Up Fraud...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
Gavin Newsom Reveals Which Potential Heir to the MAGA Movement 'Scares' Him The...
Tipsheet

Tom Cotton's 'Brilliant' Speech Defending Filibuster Was Written by Chuck Schumer

Tom Cotton's 'Brilliant' Speech Defending Filibuster Was Written by Chuck Schumer
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, Pool

Sen. Tom Cotton on Wednesday delivered a brilliant speech defending the filibuster as Democrats plot to change Senate rules to pass voting legislation. What made his remarks so powerful? He used the top Senate Democrat’s own words.

Advertisement

“Right now, we are on the precipice of a constitutional crisis. We are about to step into the abyss. I want to talk for a few minutes why we are on that precipice and why we are looking into that abyss,” Cotton said Wednesday, quoting Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

In fact, the rest of the Arkansas Republican’s speech was a reading of Schumer’s previous remarks in which he said changing Senate rules would be “a doomsday for democracy.”

“Let me first ask a fundamental question: What is the crisis that calls for the undoing of two centuries of tradition? … Are … Senators merely doing their jobs as legislators, responding to a generalized public calling for the abolition of the filibuster? Clearly not. It is not the American people at large who are demanding detonation of the nuclear option.

“[T]he nuclear option is being pushed largely by the radioactive rhetoric of a small band of radicals who hold in their hands the political fortunes of the President.

“Constitutional scholars will tell us that the reason we have these rules in the Senate—unlimited debate, two-thirds to change the rules, the idea that 60 have to close off debate—is embodied in the spirit and rule of the Constitution. … That is what the Constitution is all about, and we all know it.

“It is the Senate where the Founding Fathers established a repository of checks and balances. It is not like the House of Representatives where the majority leader or the Speaker can snap his fingers and get what he wants. … On important issues, the Founding Fathers wanted—and they were correct in my judgment—that the slimmest majority should not always govern. … The Senate is not a majoritarian body.

“The bottom line is very simple: the ideologues in the Senate want to turn what the Founding Fathers called the cooling saucer of democracy into the rubber stamp of dictatorship. … They want to make this country into a banana republic where if you don’t get your way, you change the rules! Are we going to let them? It will be a doomsday for democracy if we do.

“I, for one, hope and pray that it will not come to this. But I assure my colleagues, at least speaking for this Senator … I will do everything I can to prevent the nuclear option from being invoked not for the sake of myself or my party but for the sake of this great Republic and its traditions.” (Schumer's words, read by Cotton)

Advertisement

"Senator Schumer spoke so eloquently in defense of the Senate’s rules, customs, and traditions when the fortunes of his party looked a little different," Cotton said when he finished reading the New York Democrat's past speech.

"My, how times have changed," he continued. "[Th]e narrowest majority in Senate history wants to break the Senate rules to control how voters in every state elect senators. Could there be a better argument to preserve the Senate’s rules, customs, and traditions?"

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos